From: The impact of the genotype on the prevalence of classical scrapie at population level
Variables | Model 1 (Genotypes) | Model 2 (NSP types) | Model 3 (alleles) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Coef. | IRR | 95%CI | Coef. | IRR | 95%CI | Coef. | IRR | 95%CI |
constant | 0.7 | Â | -0.5-1.9 | -0.7 | Â | -2.1-0.7 | -0.3 | Â | -2-1.3 |
clr % ARR/ARR | -0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4-0.8 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
clr % ARR/AHQ | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.2-2.2 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
clr % AHQ/VRQ | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.99-1.5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
clr % ARH/VRQ | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.08-1.7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
clr % ARQ/VRQ | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.5-2.6 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
clr % NSP V | Â | Â | Â | 1.2 | 3.4 | 2.2-5.2 | Â | Â | Â |
clr % ARH | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.2-4.4 |
clr % ARQ | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 1.3 | 3.7 | 1.2-11.6 |
clr % AHQ | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 1 | 2.7 | 1.2-5.9 |
clr % VRQ | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 1.4 | 4 | 2-8 |
Country | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Wales | 1.7 | 5.8 | 2.3-14.9 | 1.6 | 5 | 2.1-12.1 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 1.8-10.9 |
Scotland | -1.1 | 0.3 | 0.08-1.4 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 0.3-17.8 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 0.6-20.8 |
# flocks (baseline: 1) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
2 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 0.9-7.7 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.8-5.4 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7-5.4 |
3 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.6-6.4 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.6-5.5 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.5-5.3 |
4 or more | 1.7 | 5.4 | 1.9-15.6 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 1.4-10.7 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 1.3-11.3 |
# animals (baseline: < 300) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
300-1000 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 1.5 | 4.3 | 1.2-16.1 |
> 1000 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 1.5 | 4.7 | 1.3-16.7 |
Wales × 2 flocks | -1.9 | 0.1 | 0.04-0.5 | -1.5 | 0.2 | 0.07-0.7 | -1.3 | 0.2 | 0.08-0.8 |