Skip to main content

Table 2 Model parameter description and disease input ranges used with supportive references

From: Disease properties, geography, and mitigation strategies in a simulation spread of rinderpest across the United States

 

Parameter description

Baseline

Range

Ref.

λ Vs

rate of progression from vaccinated susceptible to recovered

1/10.5 days

7-14

[28]

λ Ve

rate of progression from vaccinated quiescent infected to recovered

1/698.75 days

120-1277.5

[8]

λ R

rate of progression from recovered to susceptible

0

0

N/A

θ L

ratio of infected progress to clinical symptoms

0.975

0.95-1.0

[8]

θ D

ratio of infectious that die

0.9

0.8-1.0

[26]

ε q

efficacy of quarantine (ratio of susceptible successfully quarantined)

0.5

0.1-0.9

[22]

ε vs

efficacy of vaccine for susceptibles (will move into immune)

0.775

0.6-0.95

[6]

ε ve

efficacy of vaccine for exposed (latent only)

0.775

0.6-0.95

[5, 6]

ε c

efficacy of culling

0.5

N/A

[10, 29]

ε s

efficacy of short-range movement control

0.5

0.1-0.9

N/A

ε l

efficacy of long-range movement control

0.5

0.1-0.9

N/A

T l

time after detection until inter-state movement restricted

6.5 days

1-14

N/A