Skip to main content
Download PDF

Increased arginine, lysine, and methionine levels can improve the performance, gut integrity and immune status of turkeys but the effect is interactive and depends on challenge conditions

Veterinary Research volume 53, Article number: 59 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Arginine (Arg), lysine (Lys), and methionine (Met) can be used to support the health status of turkeys. The present study investigated selected performance, gut integrity, and immunological parameters in turkeys reared in optimal or challenge conditions. The experiment lasted for 28 days, and it had a completely randomized 2 × 3 factorial design with two levels of dietary Arg, Lys and Met (high or low) and challenge with Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or no challenge (placebo). Increased dietary levels of Arg, Lys and Met had a beneficial effect on turkey performance and immunological parameters, and it improved selected indicators responsible for maintaining gut integrity in different challenge conditions. Under optimal conditions (with no challenge), high ArgLysMet diets did not compromise bird performance and they improved selected performance parameters in challenged birds. The immune system of turkeys was not excessively stimulated by high ArgLysMet diets, which did not disrupt the redox balance and had no negative effect on gut integrity. High ArgLysMet diets increased the expression levels of selected genes encoding nutrient transporters and tight junction proteins. However, the influence exerted by different dietary inclusion levels of Arg, Lys and Met on gut integrity was largely determined by the stressor (C. perfringens vs. LPS). Further studies are required to investigate the role of Arg, Lys and Met levels in the diet on the immune response, gut function and performance of turkeys in different challenge conditions.

Introduction

Measures should be taken to improve the health status of birds (including turkeys) raised under intensive farming systems. An improvement in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) function is an important consideration. The GIT ecosystem and the resident microbiota constitute the first line of defense against pathogens and are the key components of innate and adaptive immunity [1]. Therefore, GIT function and integrity should be enhanced to stimulate defense mechanisms in birds as part of non-specific prevention [2]. Intestinal health is critical for maximizing growth performance and production efficiency in turkeys. When gut homeostasis is disrupted by pathogens, nutrient digestion and absorption are altered since priorities are shifted from maintaining regular physiological processes to fighting off the pathogens [3].

Essential amino acids (EAAs), including arginine (Arg), lysine (Lys) and methionine (Met), play a key role in supporting gastrointestinal function and the gut-associated immune system. Experiments performed on chickens demonstrated that increased dietary levels of EAAs stimulated local immunity [4], and contributed to reducing intestinal mucosa atrophy [5] and maintaining intestinal microbiota diversity under both optimal and stress conditions [6]. However, the majority of studies investigating the regulatory role of EAAs involved animal models other than turkeys [7]. Due to considerable differences in metabolism and EAA requirements resulting from different growth rates, data cannot be directly extrapolated from other poultry species to turkeys. Our previous studies [8, 9] and the findings of other authors [10] point to numerous interactions in host responses depending on the proportions of individual EAAs in the diet, birds’ age and the applied stressors. Moreover, turkey diets are formulated based on the nutritional recommendations of two companies [11, 12] that differ in the dietary rates and ratios of Arg, Lys and Met, and are aimed at optimizing growth performance rather than supporting GIT and immune functions. Therefore, the maintenance of optimal (high or low) proportions of Arg and Lys in the diet seems particularly interesting. Both AAs are structurally similar, which suggests that the differences in bird responses to their dietary content may result from varying Arg:Lys ratios in the diet. Kidd and Kerr [13] found that an increase in the dietary Arg:Lys ratio exerted the greatest effect on the body weight (BW) and body weight gain (BWG) of turkeys at 8–20 and 20 weeks of age, respectively. However, there is no information on the consequences of increasing the dietary inclusion levels of not only Arg and Lys but also Met. Oso et al. [14] demonstrated that Arg supplementation (increased to dietary Met level) led to a linear improvement in nutrient digestibility in 84-day-old turkeys and increased nutrient absorption, as indicated by increased intestinal villus height. Waldroup et al. [15] reported that increasing the Arg:Met ratio did not improve performance when Lys levels were adequate.

In view of the above, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of increased dietary Arg, Lys and Met levels on performance, GIT and immunological parameters in young turkeys reared under optimal conditions or exposed to various stressors. We hypothesized that increased levels of Arg, Lys and Met, relative to those recommended by NRC [12], would be effective in maintaining or improve bird performance by supporting gut integrity and immune function in challenge conditions.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland) resolution No. 57/2020 of 21 October 2020, and the animals were cared for under guidelines comparable to those laid down by EU Directive 2010/63/EU.

Birds and housing

The experiment was performed on female Hybrid Converter turkeys purchased from the Grelavi Hatchery in Kętrzyn. One-day-old poults (a total of 192 birds) were randomly assigned to 48 cages (replicates) in the housing facility. Each of six group consisted eight replicates with 4 birds per replication. The experiment had a completely randomized design with six groups of eight replicate cages each, with four birds per cage. Replicates (cages) in groups were uniformly (homogeneously) distributed in the building. The microclimate in the housing facility was controlled automatically, the conditions were adjusted to the birds’ age, and were consistent with the recommendations of Hybrid Turkeys [16]. All birds were housed under identical conditions. Throughout the experiment, all birds had unlimited access to feed and water.

Diets and experimental design

The experimental design is presented in Additional file 1. During the 28-day experiment, the birds were fed ad libitum isocaloric diets, which met or exceeded their nutrient requirements according to the nutrient guidelines for turkeys [16]. The experiment had a completely randomized 2 × 3 factorial design with two levels of dietary Lys, Arg and Met (high or low) and challenge with (i) Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), (ii) Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or (iii) no challenge (placebo). Low ArgLysMet diets contained 16 g Lys per kg of diet, 90% Arg relative to Lys content and 30% Met relative to Lys content, according to NRC guidelines [12]. High ArgLysMet diets contained 18 g Lys per kg of diet, 110% Arg relative to Lys content and 45% Met relative to Lys content (Additional file 2). The content of AAs (Lys, Arg and Met) was analytically determined in the basal diet, and then the adequate amounts of AAs were added to reach their respective target levels in diets. The diets were offered as crumbles. Turkeys were divided into six groups: birds fed diets with low or high levels of Arg, Lys and Met (T1 and T2, respectively), birds fed the above diets and challenged with C. perfringens (T3 and T4, respectively), birds fed the above diets and challenged with LPS (T5 and T6, respectively).

Challenge

At 25, 26 and 27 days of age, group T3 and group T4 birds were challenged with C. perfringens in accordance with the procedure developed in our laboratory [17]. Inoculum (1 mL) containing C. perfringens type A strain 56 in the amount of 2.3 × 107 CFU (day 15) and 4.5 × 107 CFU (day 16) was obtained by overnight incubation at 37 °C in brain heart infusion broth (Sigma Aldrich). The bacteria were administered directly into the crop with the use of a cannula. The amount of bacteria in the inoculum was tested analytically, according to Standard ISO 7937:2005 [18], in a veterinary laboratory (Avipoint, Olsztyn, Poland). The degree of intestinal mucosa damage was evaluated by a veterinarian (a poultry disease specialist) based on anatomopathological changes. A post-mortem examination revealed the absence of typical lesions that accompany clinical acute necrotic enteritis (NE) in turkeys [19, 20]. On the same days (25, 26 and 27 days of age), group T5 and group T6 birds were challenged with LPS in accordance with the previously described protocol [21]. Before the LPS challenge, birds were weighed individually, and LPS was administered (Escherichia coli serotype O55:B5; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 250 μg/kg BW. Before administration, LPS was dissolved in sterile 0.9% NaCl solution (0.5 mg/mL). The intestines of turkeys challenged with LPS were subjected to an anatomopathological examination by a veterinarian (a poultry disease specialist).

Gut permeability test

A gut permeability test was performed in turkeys aged 28 days. Before the test, turkeys were weighed, and eight birds per group were administered fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d, Sigma-Aldrich) at 4.17 µg/kg BW directly into the crop with the use of a cannula. Two and a half hours after the administration of FITC-d, 0.5 mL blood samples were collected from the wing vein to determine FITC-d concentrations with a fluorimeter [22].

Evaluation of turkey performance

The BW of birds were recorded and calculated on a cage basis. The feed conversion ratio (FCR; kg of feed/kg BWG) for the experimental period was calculated on a pen basis from BWG and feed consumption. Mortality rates and causes were recorded daily, and the weights of dead birds were used to adjust the average FCR.

Sample collection

At 28 days of age, blood samples were collected from the wing vein of eight birds per group (different than those used in the gut permeability test) into tubes containing EDTA K2 for flow cytometry analyses, lithium heparin for biochemical and genetic analyses or clot activator for serological analyses. Blood samples for cytometric analyses were directly used for the isolation of mononuclear cells. The remaining samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 380 × g and 4 °C (plasma) or 10 min at 1000 × g and 4 °C (serum), and the resulting plasma and serum were stored at − 20 °C until analysis. Birds were sacrificed by decapitation after electrical stunning, and the abdominal cavity was opened for the collection of jejunum (middle-jejunum) tissues, liver and spleen samples.

Laboratory analyses

Mononuclear cells were isolated from the blood and spleen in accordance with the protocol developed by Koncicki et al. [23]. The cells were counted, and their viability was evaluated using the Vi-Cell XR cell counter (Beckman Coulter, USA). The percentages of CD4+ and CD8α+ T cell and IgM+ B cell subpopulations in blood and the spleen were determined as described by Kubińska et al. [24]. Briefly; viable mononuclear cells (1 × 106) were stained with FITC-conjugated Mouse Anti Chicken CD4 clone 2-35 (Bio-Rad, UK) and PE-conjugated Mouse Anti Chicken CD8α clone 11-39 (Bio-Rad, UK) or with FITC-conjugated Goat Anti Chicken IgM polyclonal IgG (Bio-Rad, UK). Data were acquired using a FACSCanto II digital flow cytometer (BD, USA) in the FACSDiva 8.0 environment (BD, USA). The immunophenotype and percentages of subpopulations of CD4+, CD8α+, CD4+CD8α+ double positive cells and B lymphocytes (IgM+) were analyzed using FlowJo V10 software (BD, USA). A fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls for all fluorochromes was used to determine the cut-off point between background fluorescence and positive populations. The cytometer setup and tracking beads (CST, BD, USA) were used to initialize photomultiplier tubes settings. Unstained and single-stained control cells for each fluorochrome were prepared and used to set up flow cytometry compensation. A gating strategy using a spleen sample as an example is shown in Additional file 3.

DNA was isolated from the intestinal wall using QIAGEN kits. Epigenetic changes in the blood and intestinal wall of turkeys were determined by analyzing global DNA methylation (methylome) with the use of Sigma Aldrich diagnostic kits. The levels of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), endonuclease 1 (APE-1) and oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1) in the blood and intestinal wall of turkeys were determined using OxiSelect diagnostic kits (Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, USA). OxiSelect diagnostic kits (Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, USA) were also used to determine protein carbonyl (PC) and 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) derivatives as an indicator of the oxidation of AA residues. The levels of caspase 3 (Casp-3) and caspase 8 (Casp-8) were determined in the blood plasma and intestinal wall of turkeys using an ELISA kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc. San Diego, USA). The plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined in an ELISA reader using assays from Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Houston, Texas, USA). The levels of ceruloplasmin (Cp) in the plasma and jejunum of turkeys were determined using a Ceruloplasmin ELISA kit (Biomatik, Delaware, USA). The levels of total serum globulins and immunoglobulins IgA and IgY, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were determined in an ELISA reader using assays from Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Houston, Texas, USA). Anti-ORT IgY serum titers were determined using a commercial immunoenzymatic ELISA kit (IDEXX Laboratories, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The ELISA assay was performed using an epMotion 5075 LH automated pipetting system (Eppendorf), an Elx405 washer, an Elx800 absorbance microplate reader (BioTek, USA) and the KBF 115 constant climate chamber (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany).

Analysis of mRNA expression levels

The mRNA expression levels of genes were quantified in ileum samples collected from birds at 21 days of age. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed according to a previously described method with some modifications [25]. Briefly, total mRNA from the collected tissues was isolated using the Total RNA Mini Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The yield of isolated RNA was assessed spectrophotometrically (Nanodrop, NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE) and integrity was assessed electrophoretically by separation on 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. To synthesize complementary cDNA, 1000 ng/mL mRNA from selected tissues in a total volume of 20 μL was retrotranscribed using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-qPCR, with ds DNase (ThermoFisher Scientific, Warsaw, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Turkey (Gallopavo meleagridis) specific primers used for housekeeping and test gene expression determination (GLUT 1: Glucose transporter-1, GLUT 2: Glucose transporter-2, PEPT 1: Peptide transporter-1, PEPT 2: Peptide transporter-2, ASCT 1: Alanine, serine, cysteine, and threonine transporter, ZO 1: Zonula occludens 1, OCCL: Occludin, BoAT: Solute carrier family 6, member 19, SI: Sucrase isomaltase, EAAT 3: Excitatory amino acid transporter 3, CCK 1: Cholecystokinin type 1 receptor, CAT 1: Cationic amino acid transporter-1, CCK: Cholecystokinin) (Additional file 4) were designed using the Nacional Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (Bethesda, MD, USA) primer designing tool and synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich (Poland). Real-time qPCR was performed using 5 × FIREPol EvaGreen qPCR Mix Plus (no ROX; Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) in a total volume of 15 μL containing 3 μL Master Mix, 9 μL RNAse-free H2O, 2 × 0.5 μL primers (0.5 mM), and 2 μL cDNA template. Amplification was performed using a Rotor Gene 6000 thermocycler (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia) according to the following PCR protocol: one cycle at 95 °C for 15 min (enzyme activation); 35 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s (denaturation), 60 °C for 25 s (annealing), and 72 °C for 15 s (elongation); followed by one cycle at 72 °C for 7 min (product stabilization). Melting curve analysis was performed at 70–95 °C in 0.5 °C intervals. Negative controls without the cDNA template were included in each reaction. The real-time qPCR reaction for each cDNA sample was performed twice in duplicate. The identity of the PCR products was confirmed by direct sequencing. Relative gene expression was calculated using the comparative quantification option of Rotor Gene 6000 1.7 software (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and determined using the Relative Expression Software Tool based on the PCR efficiency correction algorithm. Phosphoglycerate Kinase 1 (PGK 1), Transferrin Receptor (TFRC) and Ribosomal Protein (RPS 7) genes (Additional file 4) were tested as host genes using NormFinder software. The results are presented as the relative expression of a target gene vs. a housekeeping gene and relative gene expression for a selected group of birds.

Statistical analysis

The data were subjected to 2-way ANOVA to examine the following effects: (a) main effect of two levels (low or high) of dietary ArgLysMet; (b) main effect of challenge with C. perfringens, or with LPS, or with no challenge (placebo); and (c) interaction between dietary ArgLysMet level and challenge factor. All data were analyzed using the GLM procedure of STATISTICA software version 12. When a significant interaction effect was noted, Tukey’s test was used to determine differences between the experimental factors. Data variability was expressed as pooled standard errors of the mean (SEM), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Performance response to dietary treatments

The growth performance of turkeys before the challenge (days 0–25), during the challenge (days 25–28) and throughout the experiment (days 0–28) is presented in Tables 1 and 2. High and low dietary rates of AAs significantly affected selected performance parameters in turkeys. High ArgLysMet diets increased BW at 25 (P = 0.02) and 28 (P = 0.024) days of age, increased BWG on days 0–25 (P = 0.03) and increased BW during the entire experiment (days 0–28, P = 0.02). Experimental challenge with C. perfringens or E. coli LPS had no significant effect on the growth performance of turkeys (P > 0.05). Neither high or low dietary rates of AAs nor applied challenge significantly affected Fint or FCR in all investigated periods (P > 0.05).

Table 1 Body weight (BW) and feed intake (Fint) of turkeys calculated for pre-, during-, and post-challenge periods
Full size table
Table 2 Body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of turkeys calculated for pre-, during-, and post-challenge periods
Full size table

Gut integrity response to dietary treatments

Gut permeability

The results of a gut permeability test are presented in Figure 1. Neither high nor low ArgLysMet diets significantly affected serum FITC-d concentrations in turkeys. Serum FITC-d concentrations were significantly higher in birds infected with C. perfringens than in uninfected birds (P = 0.027), whereas the administration of LPS did not induce significant differences relative to the control group.

Figure 1
figure 1

Serum FITC-d concentrations in turkeys fed high or low dietary arginine, lysine and methionine levels (A) and as a result of either C. perfringens infection, E. coli LPS challenge or no challenge (B). a,bMeans within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Full size image

Immune and redox status

Selected immunological and redox parameters in the blood plasma and jejunum of turkeys are presented in Tables 3 and 4. An analysis of plasma samples (Table 3) revealed a significant increase in 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) concentration in response to low ArgLysMet diets (P < 0.001). An analysis of the small intestinal wall (Table 4) demonstrated that neither low nor high ArgLysMet diets affected the analyzed immunological and redox parameters; only oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1) concentration increased in response to high ArgLysMet diets due to a significant diet × challenge interaction (P = 0.001). An analysis of immunological and redox parameters in the intestinal wall of turkeys (Table 4) revealed that the levels of dietary AAs significantly affected the concentrations of IgA (P < 0.001), IgY (P < 0.001), IL-6 (P = 0.027), Casp-8 (P = 0.008), OGG-1 (P = 0.015) and 8-OHdG (P < 0.001). In all cases, their effect was associated with a significant diet × challenge interaction. Low ArgLysMet diets increased IgA concentration in response to LPS, whereas high ArgLysMet diets exerted the opposite effect (P < 0.001). The concentration of IgY slightly decreased in turkeys fed low ArgLysMet diets, and considerably decreased in those fed high ArgLysMet diets (P = 0.029). The changes in IL-6 concentration were similar to those in IgA concentration (P = 0.034). The opposite relationships, also associated with the effect of LPS, were noted in the concentrations of Casp-8 (P = 0.022) and OGG-1 (P < 0.001). An analysis of the effect of infection, which was not associated with the diet × challenge interaction, revealed that LPS caused a significant increase in the concentrations of ceruloplasmin (Cp) (P = 0.046) and Casp-3 in the intestinal wall of turkeys (P = 0.049) (Table 4). An analysis of blood plasma samples (Table 3) revealed that the effect of infection, which was not associated with the diet × challenge interaction, caused an increase in the concentrations of endonuclease-1 (APEX-1) in birds infected with C. perfringens (P = 0.043) and 8-OHdG in birds challenged with C. perfringens or LPS, relative to unchallenged birds (P < 0.001); IgY concentration was lowest in turkeys administered LPS (P < 0.001); Cp concentration was higher in birds not infected with C. perfringens than in infected birds (P = 0.005). A significant diet × challenge interaction was noted for the plasma concentrations of IgA and IgM (P = 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively), which decreased in LPS-challenged turkeys, compared with C. perfringens–challenged birds.

Table 3 Selected immunological and redox parameters in the blood plasma of turkeys at 28 days of age
Full size table
Table 4 Selected immunological and redox parameters in the jejunum of turkeys at 28 days of age
Full size table

The percentages of T (CD4+, CD8α+, CD4+CD8α+) and B (IgM+) cell subpopulations in the blood and spleen of turkeys are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. The dietary inclusion levels of Arg, Lys and Met had no significant effect on the percentages of the analyzed cell subpopulations (P > 0.05). In turn, the percentage of CD4+CD8α+ double positive T cell subpopulations in the spleen of turkeys was significantly affected by infection, and it was higher in birds challenged with C. perfringens than in those administered LPS (P = 0.032). The percentage of IgM+ B subpopulations was significantly higher in turkeys receiving LPS than in those challenged with C. perfringens (P < 0.001). Infection induced significant changes in the percentage of CD4+CD8α+ T cell subpopulations in the blood of turkeys (P = 0.021). A significant diet × challenge interaction was observed (P = 0.047): infection with C. perfringens decreased their percentage in turkeys fed low ArgLysMet diets, and increased their percentage in birds fed high ArgLysMet diets.

Figure 2
figure 2

Percentages of peripheral blood T (CD4+, CD4+CD8α+, CD8α+) and B (IgM+) cell subpopulations in turkeys fed high or low dietary arginine, lysine and methionine levels (left side of the figure) and as a result of either C. perfringens infection, E. coli LPS challenge or no challenge (right side of the figure). a,bMeans within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05). A significant interaction (diet × challenge) was noted (P = 0.047) for CD4+ CD8α+.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Percentages of splenic T (CD4+, CD4+CD8α+, CD8α+) and B (IgM+) cell subpopulations in turkeys fed high or low dietary arginine, lysine and methionine levels (left side of the figure) and as a result of either C. perfringens infection, E. coli LPS challenge or no challenge (right side of the figure). a,b,cMeans within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Full size image

Response of the transcript levels of selected genes encoding gut integrity, nutrient transporters and digestive enzymes to dietary treatments

The mRNA expression patterns of selected genes encoding gut integrity regulators and nutrient transporters in the jejunum are presented in Table 5. In general, dietary AA levels had a significant effect on the mRNA expression of selected transporter genes. The expression level of the PEPT 1 gene decreased (P = 0.034), and the expression level of the PEPT 2 gene increased (P = 0.025) in response to high ArgLysMet diets. High ArgLysMet diets also decreased the expression level of the SI gene (P = 0.007), but they had no influence on the expression levels of genes encoding tight junction proteins (TJPs). The infectious agents exerted a greater effect on the expression levels of both transporter genes and genes encoding TJPs (Figure 3). Infections with both C. perfringens and LPS decreased the expression levels of GLUT 2 (P < 0.001), PEPT 1 (P < 0.001), SI (P < 0.001) and EAAT 3 (P < 0.001) genes. The expression levels of ASCT 1 (P < 0.001), OCCL (P < 0.001) and CAT 1 (P < 0.001) genes also decreased in response to the stressors, but significant diet × challenge interactions were observed in this case. The expression level of the ASCT 1 gene was not affected by low ArgLysMet diets, whereas in turkeys fed high ArgLysMet diets, infection with C. perfringens or LPS decreased the expression level of this gene, relative to unchallenged birds (P = 0.045). The expression level of the OCCL gene decreased in response to C. perfringens infection, and the noted decrease was greater in turkeys fed high ArgLysMet diets than in birds receiving low ArgLysMet diets (P = 0.005). The expression pattern of the CAT 1 gene was identical in turkeys challenged with LPS (P = 0.007).

Table 5 mRNA expression levels of selected genes encoding gut integrity regulators, nutrient transporters and digestive enzymes in turkeys at 28 days of age
Full size table

Discussion

The present results regarding birds performance response are partially consistent with the findings of Oso et al. [26], who reported that Arg-supplemented diets increased the BW of 16-week-old turkeys. In another study of turkeys [27], increased dietary Lys content, relative to NRC recommendations [12], significantly affected the FCR during the first 4 weeks of rearing. The present results partially confirm the fact that the dietary Arg:Lys ratio is of key importance because these AAs have similar structure and perform similar functions in the body [28]; therefore, diets with varying proportions of Arg and Lys exert the greatest effects on bird performance [13]. Our previous study [29] revealed that increased dietary levels of Arg and Lys had no significant influence on the growth performance of turkeys. In the current experiment, high ArgLysMet diets improved bird performance, which may suggest that the optimal ratios of all three AAs are most effective in maintaining high productivity. The present study also demonstrated that challenge with C. perfringens did not compromise the growth performance of turkeys. This indicates that subclinical NE after experimental infection with C. perfringens does not affect the BW or BWG of birds [30]. Infected turkeys that do not display disease symptoms may pose a potential health risk as vectors that carry and transmit pathogens to the food chain, because such birds are not treated or culled. In this experiment, an anatomopathological analysis of the intestines during a post-mortem examination (data not shown) revealed that most of the observed changes (hyperemia, yellow coating on the mucosa, general appearance of the intestinal wall and digesta) were not characteristic of NE associated with C. perfringens infection. The administration of E. coli LPS did not cause intestinal mucosa damage visible to the naked eye, either.

Gut permeability has been considered as indicator of gut integrity [31]. Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate dextran, a non-digestible polysaccharide with an average molecular weight of 4 kDa, is widely used as a biomarker to measure intestinal paracellular permeability in vivo. When administered per os, it does not cross the intestinal epithelial barrier in high quantities unless the barrier is compromised [31]. Intestinal barrier integrity is essential for nutrient absorption and the maintenance of normal bodily function. Intestinal barrier disfunction increases gut permeability, leading to pathological conditions in the GIT. In this respect, a key role is played by limiting AAs such as Arg, Lys and Met, which serve as substrates for protein biosynthesis and reinforce intestinal barrier function [32]. Both excess and deficiency of dietary AAs may lead to intestinal barrier dysfunction and the development of various diseases in birds raised under optimal or stress conditions [10]. In the present experiment, high ArgLysMet diets did not contribute to increased gut permeability. Oso et al. [26] also found that Arg-supplemented diets had a beneficial influence on selected parameters of intestinal morphology in turkeys (increased intestinal villus height and crypt depth). Foye et al. [33] noted improved nutrient absorption in turkey poults fed Arg in ovo. In contrast, Barekatain et al. [34] demonstrated that broiler chickens fed diets with reduced protein (and limiting AA) concentrations had higher serum FITC-d concentrations, pointing to increased intestinal permeability, compared with birds fed high-protein diets. The differences between these findings and our results could be due to the fact that growing chickens and turkeys differ considerably in their AA requirements (Aviagen [35] vs. Hendrix Genetics [16]). Our previous study revealed that increased dietary inclusion levels of Lys were more effective than Arg in modulating the functional status of the gut in turkeys by decreasing the pH of cecal digesta, enhancing the synthesis of butyric acid and decreasing the concentrations of putrefactive short-chain fatty acids and ammonia in the cecum [29]. However, the simultaneous effects of high or low dietary rates of all three AAs (Arg, Lys and Met) on gut permeability in turkeys have not been investigated to date. Interestingly, the present findings point to differences between the analyzed stressors since infection with C. perfringens resulted in greater intestinal permeability than the administration of E. coli LPS. The noted differences were due to the different modes of action of live C. perfringens bacteria and LPS (endotoxin) isolated from E. coli in the host’s body [36]. In broiler chickens, E. coli LPS stimulated the production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6) and TNF-α by macrophages [37], whereas C. perfringens reduced matrix metalloproteinase activity in the jejunal mucosa [38].

Another factor closely related to gut barrier function is immune and redox status. The present results regarding blood immune and redox status of birds indicate that under optimal conditions (in the absence of stressors), increased dietary inclusion levels of Arg, Lys and Met did not over-stimulate the immune system and did not disrupt the redox balance in the GIT. It should be noted that in contrast to other immunostimulatory substances, AAs do not increase the demand for energy and nutrients (in particular protein) to maintain the immune responses of birds that had been triggered unnecessarily [39]. Therefore, they do not contribute to chronic stimulation that reduces the efficiency of the immune system. Analysis of the immune and redox status of the small intestinal wall of birds do not corroborate the results of our previous study [40] where turkeys were fed diets with different Arg:Lys ratios relative to Met. In the cited study, no significant interactions were found between different dietary proportions of Arg and Lys vs. the immune response and the antioxidant status in the intestinal wall and blood of turkeys. In another experiment [17], where diets differed also in Met content and turkeys were infected with C. perfringens, diet × challenge interactions were observed more frequently, similarly to the present study. In this study, turkeys were also exposed to another pathological factor, i.e. LPS isolated from E. coli cell walls. It was found that the immune and oxidative responses of young turkeys varied depending on the stressor (C. perfringens vs. LPS), and further research is needed to explore those relationships. The host’s response to LPS was more spontaneous, which could be due to the fact that this stressor exerted both toxic and immunomodulatory (adjuvant) effects on the gut-associated immune system in birds [36, 41].

Double positive T cells (CD4+CD8+) play a central role in peripheral tissues as strong suppressors of immunity and as cells with high cytotoxic potential [42, 43]. Similarly to redox status markers, no significant differences in immune system function were observed in turkeys fed diets with different inclusion levels of Arg, Lys and Met, which indicates that the applied dietary treatments had no negative effect on the health status of birds. In a study by De Jonge et al. [44], Arg deficiency compromised B cell proliferation in the spleen of transgenic mice. Li et al. [45] found that Arg played a key role in the proliferation of T and B cells in poultry. According to Calder [46], Arg is required for the synthesis of immune system proteins in turkeys, similarly to Met [47, 48], which is why in this experiment neither high nor low ArgLysMet diets had a negative effect on the percentages of the analyzed T and B cell subpopulations in the spleen of turkeys. Other studies demonstrated that increased dietary Met content (by 0.60% relative to the control group where the recommended level of Met was applied) contributed to an increase in Met concentration in peripheral blood and in the percentages of CD4+CD8α+ T cell subpopulation in the thymus and the bursa of Fabricius in experimental birds [24, 49]. In the present study, differences were noted in the percentages of CD4+CD8α+ T cell and IgM+ B cell subpopulations in the spleen of turkeys in response to the challenge (C. perfringens vs. LPS); infection with C. perfringens led to a greater increase in the percentage of CD4+CD8α+ T cell subpopulations than the administration of LPS, whereas the opposite was observed in IgM+ B cells. The above differences most probably resulted from the fact that C. perfringens and LPS exerted different effects on the immune system of turkeys. It was found that proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, participate in the initiation of T and B cell proliferation in response to stressors [50].

Nutrient transporters are proteins responsible for the transportation of AAs into and out of cells. Aminopeptidase cleaves AAs from the N-terminus of polypeptides, making them available for transportation, whereas PEPT 1 is a di- and tripeptide transporter. In the intestine, these proteins are located on the brush border and the basolateral membranes of enterocytes, and they are involved in the uptake of AAs by enterocytes and their release into circulation or distribution among other cells [51]. Individual AAs are absorbed by various Na+ dependent and independent transport systems [52]. However, most AAs from proteins transported to the intestines are absorbed as dipeptides and tripeptides rather than individually. Dipeptides and tripeptides are absorbed more rapidly and efficiently via the PEPT 1 transporter than individual AAs [53]. The expression of the PEPT 1 gene was confirmed in poultry [54, 55], but further research is needed to elucidate the role of the PEPT 1 transporter in intestinal AA capture in birds. In the current experiment, the expression level of the PEPT 1 gene decreased in jejunal tissue in response to high ArgLysMet diets. Most probably, this resulted from the fact that larger amounts of available AAs (Arg Lys Met) were transported to the small intestine, leading to slower release of free AAs, which reduced the need for increased expression of the PEPT 1 gene in the intestine. Similar relationships were observed in broiler chickens by Gilbert et al. [56]. Another important transporter is PEPT 2, a high-affinity/low-capacity transporter that translocates dipeptides and tripeptides [57]. In the current study, high ArgLysMet diets increased the expression level of the PEPT 2 gene in small intestinal tissue. In broiler chickens, the expression level of the PEPT 2 gene increased significantly in the bursa of Fabricius at 14 days of age [58]. PEPT 2 can transport peptides to developing tissues, and peptide-based vaccines can boost the immune system [59]. It has also been found that PEPT 2 is expressed in the brain, kidneys, GIT, liver and lungs of birds during late embryogenesis, which suggests that it can act as an embryonic peptide transporter [60]. In the present experiment, high ArgLysMet diets decreased the expression of the gene encoding enzyme SI that is responsible for releasing glucose and fructose from nutrients. The correlation between high and low dietary levels of Arg, Lys and Met and the formation of functional enzyme SI has not been fully elucidated. It can be speculated that when a larger pool of AAs reaches the small intestine, changes in the expression levels of genes encoding the enzyme involved in glucose and fructose release are not needed due to the greater availability of AAs, because their transportation requires the expenditure of energy [61]. In the present study, changes in the expression levels of the analyzed genes were most pronounced in challenged turkeys. The expression levels of most genes encoding nutrient transporters, enzymes and TJPs were modified, and they decreased in the small intestinal tissue in all cases. This implies that even mild infection induces significant changes at the molecular level, although the growth performance of birds is not compromised, which corroborates the findings of Olkowski et al. [30]. Proteins of the occludin group (OCCL) are particularly important for maintaining intestinal barrier integrity because they are integral membrane proteins in tight junctions [62]. They form a tight barrier around cells and act as a physical barrier to the free flow of nutrients through intercellular spaces. Our previous study [17] revealed that C. perfringens bacteria can compromise the intestinal barrier by disintegrating TJPs in turkeys, which leads to malabsorption. The current study demonstrated that LPS can exert similar effects. In an experiment involving broiler chickens, the applied stressor (infection with Campylobacter jejuni) compromised nutrient transporter expression including GLUT 2, EAAT 3 and CST 1 in the small and large intestines [63]. Teng et al. [64] reported that the expression levels of genes encoding biomarkers associated with intestinal integrity and nutrient transporters decreased in broiler chickens infected with Eimeria Maxima.

The results of the present study demonstrated that increased dietary levels of Arg, Lys and Met had a beneficial effect on turkey performance and immunological parameters, and it improved selected indicators responsible for maintaining gut integrity in different challenge conditions. Under optimal conditions (with no challenge), high ArgLysMet diets maintained bird performance and they improved selected performance parameters in challenged birds. The immune system of turkeys was not excessively stimulated by high ArgLysMet diets, which did not disrupt the redox balance and had no negative effect on gut integrity. High ArgLysMet diets increased the expression levels of selected genes encoding nutrient transporters and TJPs. However, the influence exerted by different dietary inclusion levels of Arg, Lys and Met on gut integrity was largely interactive and determined by the stressor (C. perfringens vs. LPS). Further studies are required to investigate the role of Arg, Lys and Met levels in the diet on the immune response, gut function and performance of turkeys in different challenge conditions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

8-OHdG:

8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine

ALP:

albumin

ALT:

alanine aminotransferase

APE-1:

endonuclease 1

Arg:

arginine

BWG:

body weight gain

CK:

creatine kinase

GLP 2:

glucagon-like peptide 2

GPx:

glutathione peroxidase

LPS:

E. coli Lipopolysaccharide

Lys:

lysine

Met:

methionine

NE:

necrotic enteritis

NSP:

non-starch polysaccharides

OCCL:

occludin

SOD:

superoxide dismutase

TC:

total cholesterol

TG:

triglycerides

TJPs:

tight junction proteins

TP:

total protein

UA:

uric acid

ZO 1:

Zonula occludens 1

References

  1. Brisbin JT, Gong J, Sharif S (2008) Interactions between commensal bacteria and the gut-associated immune system of the chicken. Anim Health Res Rev 9:101–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kogut MH, Yin X, Yuan J, Broom L (2017) Gut health in poultry. Cab Rev 12:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Korver DR (2006) Overview of the immune dynamics of the digestive system. J Appl Poult Res 15:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zulkifli I, Shakeri M, Soleimani AF (2016) Dietary supplementation of L-glutamine and L-glutamate in broiler chicks subjected to delayed placement. Poult Sci 95:2757–2763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu G (1998) Intestinal mucosal amino acid catabolism. J Nutr 128:1249–1252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong XY, Azzam MMM, Zou XT (2017) Effects of dietary threonine supplementation on intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota of laying hens. Poult Sci 96:3654–3663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bortoluzzi C, Rochell SJ, Applegate TJ (2018) Threonine, arginine, and glutamine: influences on intestinal physiology, immunology, and microbiology in broilers. Poult Sci 97:937–945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jankowski J, Ognik K, Konieczka P, Mikulski D (2020) Effects of different levels of arginine and methionine in a high-lysine diet on the immune status, performance, and carcass traits of turkeys. Poult Sci 99:4730–4740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tykałowski B, Śmiałek M, Koncicki A, Ognik K, Zduńczyk Z, Jankowski J (2019) The immune response of young turkeys to haemorrhagic enteritis virus infection at different levels and sources of methionine in the diet. BMC Vet Res 15:387

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montout L, Poullet N, Bambou JC (2021) Systematic review of the interaction between nutrition and immunity in livestock: effect of dietary supplementation with synthetic amino acids. Animals 11:2813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. BUT: Aviagen Turkeys (2015) Feeding Guidelines for Nicholas and B.U.T. Heavy Lines. https://www.aviagenturkeys.com/uploads/2015/11/20/NU06%20Feeding%20Guidelines%20for%20Nicholas%20&%20BUT%20Heavy%20Lines%20EN.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2022

  12. NRC: Research Council National (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th edn. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kidd MT, Kerr BJ (1998) Dietary arginine and lysine ratios in Large White toms. 2. Lack of interaction between arginine: Lysine ratios and electrolyte balance. Poult Sci 77:864–869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oso AO, Williams GA, Oluwatosin OO, Bamgbose AM, Adebayo AO, Olowofeso O, Pirgozliev V, Adegbenjo AA, Osho SO, Alabi JO, Li F, Liu H, Yao K, Xin W (2017) Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, metabolizable energy, and intestinal morphology of growing turkeys fed diet supplemented with arginine. Livest Sci 198:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Waldroup PW, England JA, Kidd MT, Kerr BJ (1998) Dietary arginine and lysine in large white toms. 1. Increasing arginine: lysine ratios does not improve performance when lysine levels are adequate. Poult Sci 77:1364–1370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendrix Genetics (2019) Technical guide for Hybrid Turkeys commercial products. https://www.hendrix-genetics.com/documents/529/Commercial_Management_Guide_EN_Jan2022.pdf Accessed 9 Feb 2022.

  17. Ognik K, Konieczka P, Mikulski D, Jankowski J (2020) The effect of different dietary ratios of lysine and arginine in diets with high or low methionine levels on oxidative and epigenetic DNA damage, the gene expression of tight junction proteins and selected metabolic parameters in Clostridium perfringens-challenged turkeys. Vet Res 51:50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. PN EN ISO 7937 (2005) Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs - Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Clostridium perfringens - Colony-count Technique (in Polish)

  19. Olkowski AA, Wojnarowicz C, Chirino-Trejo M, Drew MD (2006) Responses of broiler chickens orally challenged with Clostridium perfringens isolated from field cases of necrotic enteritis. Res Vet Sci 81:99–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Timbermont L, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F (2011) Necrotic enteritis in broilers: an updated review on the pathogenesis. Avian Pathol 40:341–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Konieczka P, Barszcz M, Kowalczyk P, Szlis M, Jankowski J (2019) The potential of acetylsalicylic acid and vitamin E in modulating inflammatory cascades in chickens under lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. Vet Res 50:65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zanu HK, Kheravii SK, Morgan NK, Bedford MR, Swick RA (2020) Interactive effect of dietary calcium and phytase on broilers challenged with subclinical necrotic enteritis: part 2. Gut permeability, phytate ester concentrations, jejunal gene expression, and intestinal morphology. Poult Sci 99:4914–4928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Koncicki A, Tykalowski B, Stenzel T, Smialek M, Pestka D (2012) Effect of infection of turkeys with haemorrhagic enteritis adenovirus isolate on the selected parameters of cellular immunity and the course of colibacillosis. Pol J Vet Sci 15:215–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kubińska M, Tykałowski B, Jankowski J, Koncicki A (2014) Immunological and biochemical indicators in turkeys fed diets with different methionine content. Pol J Vet Sci 17:687–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Konieczka P, Sandvang D, Kinsner M, Szkopek D, Szyryńska N, Jankowski J (2022) Bacillus-based probiotics affect gut barrier integrity in different ways in chickens subjected to optimal or challenge conditions. Vet Microbiol 265:109323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oso AO, Williams GA, Oluwatosin OO, Bamgbose AM, Adebayo AO, Olowofeso O, Pirgozliev V, Adegbenjo AA, Osho SO, Alabi JO, Li F, Liu H, Yao K, Xin W (2017) Effect of dietary supplementation with arginine on haematological indices, serum chemistry, carcass yield, gut microflora, and lymphoid organs of growing turkeys. Livest Sci 198:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Veldkamp T, Kwakkel R, Ferket P, Kogut J, Verstegen M (2003) Growth responses to dietary lysine at high and low ambient temperature in male turkeys. Poult Sci 82:1733–1746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen J, Wang M, Kong Y, Ma H, Zou S (2011) Comparison of the novel compounds creatine and pyruvateon lipid and protein metabolism in broiler chickens. Animal 5:1082–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Konieczka P, Mikulski D, Ognik K, Juśkiewicz J, Zduńczyk Z, Jankowski J (2021) Increased dietary inclusion levels of lysine are more effective than arginine in supporting the functional status of the gut in growing turkeys. Animals 11:2351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Olkowski AA, Wojnarowicz C, Chirino-Trejo M, Laarveld B, Sawicki G (2008) Sub-clinical necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: novel etiological consideration based on ultra-structural and molecular changes in the intestinal tissue. Res Vet Sci 85:543–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gilani S, Howarth GS, Kitessa SM, Tran CD, Forder REA, Hughes RJ (2017) New biomarkers for increased intestinal permeability induced by dextran sodium sulphate and fasting in chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 101:e237–e245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Soomro RN, Yao J, El-Hack A, Asif Arain M, Abbasi IHR, Saeed M, Soomro SA, Mohamed MAE, Hu R, Qiao Y, Yang X, Alagawany M, Laudadio V, Dhama K, Tufarelli V (2018) Significance of endogenous amino acid losses in the nutrition of some poultry species: a review. J Anim Plant Sci 28:1547–1557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Foye OT, Ferket PR, Uni Z (2007) The effects of in ovo feeding arginine, β-hydroxy-β-methyl-butyrate, and protein on jejunal digestive and absorptive activity in embryonic and neonatal turkey poults. Poult Sci 86:2343–2349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Barekatain R, Nattrass G, Tilbrook AJ, Chousalkar K, Gilani S (2019) Reduced protein diet and amino acid concentration alter intestinal barrier function and performance of broiler chickens with or without synthetic glucocorticoid. Poult Sci 98:3662–3675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aviagen Broiler Ross 308. Nutrition Specification (2019) https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/RossBroilerNutritionSpecs2019-EN.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2022.

  36. Rietschel ET, Kirikae T, Schade FU, Mamat U, Schmidt G, Loppnow H, Ulmer AJ, Zähringer U, Seydel U, Di Padova F, Schreier M, Brade H (1994) Bacterial endotoxin: molecular relationships of structure to activity and function. FASEB J 8:217–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Takahashi K, Ohta N, Akiba Y (1997) Influences of dietary methionine and cysteine on metabolic responses to immunological stress by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide injection, and mitogenic response in broiler chickens. Br J Nutr 78:815–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Damme L, Cox N, Callens C, Haesebrouck F, Dargatz M, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F, Goossens E (2020) C. perfringens challenge reduces matrix metalloproteinase activity in the jejunal mucosa of Eimeria-infected broiler chickens. Vet Res 51:100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang J, Liu L, Sheikhahmadi A, Wang Y, Li C, Jiao H, Lin H, Song Z (2015) Effects of corticosterone and dietary energy on immune function of broiler chickens. PLoS One 10:e0119750

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ognik K, Mikulski D, Konieczka P, Tykałowski B, Krauze M, Stępniowska A, Nynca A, Jankowski J (2021) The immune status, oxidative and epigenetic changes in tissues of turkeys fed diets with different ratios of arginine and lysine. Sci Rep 11:15975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Agrawal PK (1995) Studies on the cell-mediated immune response of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) in poultry. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, IA, USA

  42. Overgaard NH, Jung JW, Steptoe RJ, Wells JW (2015) CD4+/CD8+ double-positive T cells: more than just a developmental stage? J Leukoc Biol 97:31–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Parel Y, Chizzolini C (2004) CD4+ CD8+ double positive (DP) T cells in health and disease. Autoimmun Rev 3:215–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. de Jonge WJ, Kwikkers KL, te Velde AA, van Deventer SJ, Nolte MA, Mebius RE, Ruijter JM, Lamers MC, Lamers WH (2002) Arginine deficiency affects early B cell maturation and lymphoid organ development in transgenic mice. J Clin Invest 110:1539–1548

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Li P, Yin YL, Li D, Kim SW, Wu G (2007) Amino acids and immune function. Br J Nutr 98:237–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Calder PC, Yaqoob P (2003) Amino acids and immune function. In, Cynober, Luc A. (ed.) Metabolic and Therapeutic Aspects of Amino Acids in Clinical Nutrition. Second Edition. Boca Raton, US. Chemical Rubber Company, pp. 284–306

  47. Jankowski J, Tykałowski B, Ognik K, Koncicki A, Kubińska M, Zduńczyk Z (2018) The effect of different dietary levels of DL-methionine and DL-hydroxy analogue on the antioxidant status of young turkeys infected with the haemorrhagic enteritis virus. BMC Vet Res 14:404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME (2006) The sulfur-containing amino acids: an overview. J Nutr 136:1636S-1640S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mirzaaghatabar F, Saki AA, Zamani P, Aliarabi H, Hemati Matin HR (2011) Effect of different levels of diet methionine and metabolisable energy on broiler performance and immune system. Food Agric Immunol 22:93–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Vahsen T, Zapata L, Guabiraba R, Melloul E, Cordonnier N, Botterel F, Guillot J, Arné P, Risco-Castillo V (2021) Cellular and molecular insights on the regulation of innate immune responses to experimental aspergillosis in chicken and turkey poults. Med Mycol 59:465–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Miska KB, Fetterer RH, Wong EA (2015) mRNA expression of amino acid transporters, aminopeptidase, and the di-and tri-peptide transporter PepT1 in the intestine and liver of posthatch broiler chicks. Poult Sci 94:1323–1332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hyde R, Taylor PM, Hundal HS (2003) Amino acid transporters: roles in amino acid sensing and signalling in animal cells. Biochem 373:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Miska KB, Fetterer RH (2019) Expression of amino acid and sugar transporters, aminopeptidase, and the di-and tri-peptide transporter PepT1; differences between modern fast-growing broilers and broilers not selected for rapid growth. Poult Sci 98:2272–2280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Daniel H (2004) Molecular and integrative physiology of intestinal peptide transport. Annu Rev Physiol 66:361–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gilbert ER, Wong EA, Webb KE (2008) Peptide absorption and utilization: implications for animal nutrition and health. J Anim Sci 86:2135–2155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gilbert ER, Li H, Emmerson DA, Webb KE Jr, Wong EA (2010) Dietary protein composition influences abundance of peptide and amino acid transporter messenger ribonucleic acid in the small intestine of 2 lines of broiler chicks. Poult Sci 89:1663–1676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu W, Liang R, Ramamoorthy S, Fei YJ, Ganapathy ME, Hediger MA, Ganapathya V, Leibach FH (1995) Molecular cloning of PEPT 2, a new member of the H+/peptide cotransporter family, from human kidney. Biochim Biophys Acta 1235:461–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Whittow Sturkie’s GC (2000) Avian physiology. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  59. St Georgiev V (1990) Immunomodulatory activity of small peptides. Trends Pharmacol Sci 11:373–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zwarycz B, Wong EA (2013) Expression of the peptide transporters PepT1, PepT2, and PHT1 in the embryonic and posthatch chick. Poult Sci 92:1314–1321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mueckler M, Thorens B (2013) The SLC2 (GLUT) family of membrane transporters. Mol Aspects Med 34:121–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen J, Tellez G, Richards JD, Escobar J (2015) Identification of potential biomarkers for gut barrier failure in broiler chickens. Front Vet Sci 2:14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Awad WA, Aschenbach JR, Ghareeb K, Khayal B, Hess C, Hess M (2014) Campylobacter jejuni influences the expression of nutrient transporter genes in the intestine of chickens. Vet Microbiol 172:195–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Teng PY, Choi J, Tompkins Y, Lillehoj H, Kim W (2021) Impacts of increasing challenge with Eimeria maxima on the growth performance and gene expression of biomarkers associated with intestinal integrity and nutrient transporters. Vet Res 52:81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Marzena Mikulska from University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn for assistance in statistical analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Grant No. 2017/27/B/NZ9/01007. This work was partially supported (gene expression analysis) by the Minister of Education and Science under the program entitled “Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/rid/2018/19, amount of funding: PLN 12 000 000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Poultry Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland

    Paweł Konieczka, Dariusz Mikulski & Jan Jankowski

  2. Department of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10‑719, Olsztyn, Poland

    Bartłomiej Tykałowski

  3. Department of Biochemistry and Toxicology, University of Life Sciences, 20-950, Lublin, Poland

    Katarzyna Ognik

  4. Department of Animal Nutrition, The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Instytucka 3, 05-110, Jabłonna, Poland

    Paweł Konieczka, Misza Kinsner, Dominika Szkopek & Maciej Wójcik

Authors
  1. Paweł Konieczka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bartłomiej Tykałowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katarzyna Ognik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Misza Kinsner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dominika Szkopek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maciej Wójcik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dariusz Mikulski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jan Jankowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PK designed the experiment and formulated the challenge concept, performed the turkey trial, and drafted the final manuscript. BT performed analyses involving immunological markers. KO analyzed immunological and redox parameters and edited the manuscript. MK, DS and MW analyzed gene expression. DM performed the turkey trial and interpreted statistical data. JJ study conceptualization, interpreted the results and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paweł Konieczka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland) resolution No. 57/2020 of 21 October 2020, and the animals were cared for under guidelines comparable to those laid down by EU Directive 2010/63/EU.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Experiment layout.

Low ArgLysMet, diets with low arginine, lysine and methionine levels; High ArgLysMet, diets with high arginine, lysine and methionine levels. At 25, 26, and 27, days of age, birds were challenged either with C. perfringens type A strain 56 (C. perfringens) or lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli (LPS), or served as a placebo group with no challenge.

13567_2022_1080_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Additional file 2. Ingredient composition and nutrient content of basal diets (g/100 g, as-fed basis) fed to turkeys at 1–28 days of age.

Additional file 3. Gating strategy for extracellular staining for CD4

+, CD8α+, CD4+CD8α+ and IgM+ cells in spleen sample of the examined turkeys. Abbreviations; FSC-A: forward scatter area, FSC-H: forward scatter height SSC-A: side scatter area.

Additional file 4. Genes and primers used in the study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konieczka, P., Tykałowski, B., Ognik, K. et al. Increased arginine, lysine, and methionine levels can improve the performance, gut integrity and immune status of turkeys but the effect is interactive and depends on challenge conditions. Vet Res 53, 59 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-022-01080-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-022-01080-7

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716