Skip to main content
Download PDF

Priming of the murine mammary gland with Staphylococcus chromogenes IM reduces bacterial growth of Streptococcus uberis: a proof-of-concept study

Veterinary Research volume 54, Article number: 28 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Streptococcus uberis is a major causative agent of bovine mastitis, an inflammation of the mammary gland with substantial economic consequences. To reduce antibiotic use in animal agriculture, alternative strategies to treat or prevent mastitis are being investigated. Bovine-associated non-aureus staphylococci are proposed in that respect due to their capacity to inhibit the in vitro growth of S. uberis. We demonstrate that priming the murine mammary gland with Staphylococcus chromogenes IM reduces S. uberis growth in comparison with non-primed glands. The innate immune system is activated by increasing IL-8 and LCN2, which may explain this decreased growth.

Introduction, methods and results

Bovine mastitis is defined as the inflammatory response of the mammary gland of cows in response to an intramammary infection, mostly by bacteria. As it is such a prevalent infectious disease in dairy cows, it causes major economic losses to the global dairy industry. Also, bovine mastitis impacts farmers serenity, leads to substantial food waste and threatens cow welfare. In view of the emerging antimicrobial resistance crisis, there is a sense of urgency to reduce the use of antimicrobials, also in the livestock sector [1]. Alternatives to small molecule antibiotics dominating the bovine mastitis field are warranted [2]. Hence, solutions might be found in bacteria adapted to the mammary gland niche, such as some non-aureus staphylococci (NAS) [2]. Historically, NAS are considered minor mastitis pathogens, but emerging reports claim that some of the NAS are relevant concerning udder homeostasis [2, 3]. Staphylococcus chromogenes is the most prevalent NAS species and has been retrieved from bovine teat skin, used bedding and bulk tank milk, classifying it as a host-adapted bacterium [4]. Still, differences in adherence to bovine mammary epithelial cells between S. chromogenes strains have been demonstrated in vitro [5], as well as differences in the colonization of the mammary gland in mice [6] and in heifers [7]. Protective effects of S. chromogenes against intramammary infection with major pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus uberis have been described [8,9,10]. These effects have been related to bacterial secreted mediators such as bacteriocins and other potentially beneficial mechanisms such as priming of the immune system [9, 11]. We previously showed that S. chromogenes IM, a bovine-derived mastitis strain, is able to (i) inhibit the in vitro growth of major mastitis pathogens including S. uberis and (ii) colonize the bovine mammary gland in vivo [12, 13]. To better understand whether priming the mammary gland with S. chromogenes IM inhibits the growth of S. uberis, mouse experiments were hereafter conducted in which S. chromogenes IM-primed murine mammary glands were challenged with S. uberis. Our groups have previously demonstrated such growth inhibition of S. aureus by priming the murine mammary gland with lipopolysaccharides and lipoteichoic acids [14]. The relevance and comparison of the mouse as a mastitis model for dairy cows was previously described by our groups [15].

Firstly, the optimal inoculation dose to study the potential protective effect of S. chromogenes IM was determined by characterizing its bacterial growth in the murine mammary gland. For this purpose, lactating Hsd:ICR (CD1) mice were assigned to six different groups and intramammary inoculated in the fourth gland pair with S. chromogenes IM using serial doses ranging from 102 to 107 colony-forming units (CFU) (number of animals; nanimals = between 8 and 10 per dose group). A seventh group received sham (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS) as a negative control (nanimals = 6). We refer to our previous papers for a detailed methodology of inoculum preparation, intraductal inoculation, euthanasia of the mice, tissue harvesting and processing [6, 14, 16]. Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism (version 9.5.0) to calculate P-values and determine statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Two groups were compared with unpaired, two-tailed t-tests, and multiple groups with analysis of the variance (ANOVA) and a Bonferroni post hoc-test. Mice were clinically scored from 0 to 3 based on body weight and temperature, body condition score, behaviour and general appearance at 24 h post-inoculation (hpi) inspired by the Morton and Griffiths scheme (1985). This clinical score was comparable for the S. chromogenes IM- and sham-inoculated animals, i.e., 0.38 ± 0.18 (nanimals = 8) and 0.17 ± 0.17 (nanimals = 6), respectively (mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); data provided are for the group with an intermediate inoculum dose of 104 CFU). Upon necropsy, mice inoculated with S. chromogenes IM showed swollen mammary glands with increased vascularization and redness compared to the sham-inoculated group. However, no differences were macroscopically observed between the six S. chromogenes IM inoculum dose groups. Corroborating this qualitative observation, S. chromogenes IM attained a similar bacterial load in all inoculated groups at 24 hpi (Figure 1A). Inoculated mammary glands were also evaluated microscopically. The luminal area was filled with milk in the sham-inoculated animals, while in all six S. chromogenes IM-inoculated groups the presence of luminal immune cells was observed (Figures 1B, C). The majority of these were identified as polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) based on their characteristic multilocular feature (Figure 1C). To further evaluate the observed innate immune response to S. chromogenes IM, concentrations of the pro-inflammatory mediators interleukin (IL)-8 (i.e., the murine analogue MIP-2) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (LCN)2 (a.k.a. NGAL) were determined on mammary gland lysates with validated immuno-assays as previously described by our group [6, 14, 16]. For both IL-8 and LCN2, an inflection point was observed for the 104 CFU inoculation dose (Figures 1D, E). This means that the IL-8 and LCN2 concentrations for the 104, 105, 106 and 107 CFU inoculated animals differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the sham group (Figures 1D, E). In contrast, IL-8 and LCN2 concentrations for mice inoculated with 102 and 103 S. chromogenes IM did not differ significantly (p > 0.01) from sham-inoculated mice (Figures 1D, E). Interestingly, the concentration of LCN2 followed an increasing trend correlating with the inoculation dose (Figure 1E). Following this inflection point at 104 CFU, it was decided to proceed in the S. chromogenes IM/S. uberis superchallenge experiment with the latter dose to investigate if the observed priming of the mammary gland immune system by S. chromogenes IM was sufficient to prevent S. uberis growth.

Figure 1
figure 1

Murine mammary gland response to inoculation with different doses of Staphylococcus chromogenes IM. A Bacterial load, D IL-8 and E LCN2 concentrations in mouse mammary glands harvested 24 h after intraductally inoculating Staphylococcus chromogenes IM at serial doses ranging from 102 to 107 CFU, as well as representative H&E-stained sections of B sham (PBS) or C S. chromogenes IM-inoculated mammary glands (104 CFU) at 24 h post-inoculation. Data are shown as individual points with a line indicating the mean and an error bar representing the standard error of the mean (SEM). Double (**) and triple (***) asterisks indicate respectively p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, whereas “ns” indicates non-significance corresponding to a p > 0.01. Pictures were taken at a 10 × and 40 × magnification, with scale bars indicating 100 µm and 25 µm, respectively.

Full size image

Secondly, an S. uberis infection experiment was performed to identify a suitable strain able to efficiently colonize the murine mammary gland. Three bovine-derived S. uberis ATCC strains, i.e., ATCC BAA-854 (a.k.a. 0140J), ATCC 27958 (a.k.a. NADC C-1) and ATCC 19436 (a.k.a. NCTC 3858) were intramammary injected with an inoculum of 103 CFU to evaluate the same parameters as selected for S. chromogenes IM at 24 hpi, in comparison with sham-inoculated glands again used as a negative control. The clinical scores assigned to the inoculated mice were highest in the S. uberis NADC C-1 group, followed by the 0140J and NCTC 3858 groups, and were lowest in the sham-inoculated group i.e., 1.00 ± 0.41 (nanimals = 4), 0.75 ± 0.25 (nanimals = 4), 0.50 ± 0.50 (nanimals = 2) and 0.33 ± 0.33 (nanimals = 3), respectively. Upon necropsy, the glands inoculated with the S. uberis 0140J and NADC C-1 strains showed similar macroscopic signs as the S. chromogenes IM inoculated glands, i.e., swelling, vascularization and redness, in marked contrast to the S. uberis NCTC 3858-inoculated glands which were comparable to the sham-inoculated glands. Corroborating these qualitative findings, a bacterial load of 4.25 ± 0.36 (nglands = 5) and 7.50 ± 0.19 (n glands = 6) log CFU/g tissue was retrieved from the S. uberis 0140J and NADC C-1 inoculated glands, respectively (Figure 2A). Again, in marked contrast, S. uberis was not isolated from mouse mammary glands inoculated with strain NCTC 3858, supporting the macroscopic observations. Therefore, S. uberis NCTC 3858 was excluded as a candidate strain for the final S. chromogenes IM/S. uberis superchallenge experiment. Upon the subsequent microscopic evaluation, an influx of immune cells in the alveoli was observed in the S. uberis 0140J and NADC C-1 inoculated mammary glands which were again absent in the sham-inoculated glands (Figures 2B, C). The influx and morphology of these immune cells were similar to that in S. chromogenes IM-challenged glands, identifying them as PMNs based on their polymorphonuclear feature. The PMN influx was not homogeneous across the murine mammary gland, in the sense that not every duct or gland contained the same amount of PMNs (Figure 2C). The IL-8 concentrations non-significantly increased (p > 0.01) in the S. uberis 0140J and NADC C-1 inoculated glands versus (vs.) the negative control (Figure 2D). Likewise, no significant difference (p > 0.01) was seen in LCN2 concentrations between the S. uberis 0140J and NADC C-1 inoculated glands vs. the negative control. Given its significantly (p < 0.001) higher and less variable bacterial load in the infected murine mammary glands at 24 hpi (Figure 2A), the S. uberis NADC C-1 strain was chosen for the final S. chromogenes IM/S. uberis superchallenge experiment.

Figure 2
figure 2

Murine mammary gland response to inoculation with different strains of Streptococcus uberis. A Bacterial load, D IL-8 and E LCN2 concentrations in mouse mammary glands harvested 24 h after intraductally inoculating 103 CFU S. uberis 0140J or NADC C-1, as well as representative H&E-stained sections of B sham or C Streptococcus uberis 0140J-inoculated mammary glands at 24 h post-inoculation. No CFUs were retrieved from the S. uberis NCTC 3858 inoculated mouse mammary glands. Data are shown as individual points with a line indicating the mean and an error bar representing the SEM. A triple (***) asterisk indicates p < 0.001, whereas “ns” indicates non-significance corresponding to a p > 0.01. Pictures were taken at a 10 × and 40 × magnification, with scale bars indicating 100 µm and 25 µm, respectively.

Full size image

Thirdly, the hypothesized protective effect of a priming with S. chromogenes IM against S. uberis NADC C-1 was investigated as follows (schematically shown in Figure 3): (1) a first group of mice received 104 CFU S. chromogenes IM followed by challenge with 103 CFU S. uberis NADC C-1 24 h later (i.e., the so-called superchallenge group), (2) a second group received a sham (PBS) inoculation following the 104 CFU S. chromogenes IM inoculation administered 24 h earlier (i.e., the positive control for S. chromogenes IM challenge), (3) a third group also received a sham (PBS) inoculation but this now preceded the S. uberis NADC C-1 challenge administered 24 h later (i.e., the positive control for S. uberis infection) and (4) a fourth group twice received a sham (PBS) inoculation (i.e., the negative control). At 48 h, i.e., 24 h after these second inoculations, all mice were euthanized and their mammary glands were harvested and processed as described before. The clinical score assigned to the four groups did not differ, i.e., 1.78 ± 0.15 (nanimals = 9) for S. chromogenes IM-S. uberis NADC C-1 (superchallenge group), 1.83 ± 0.31 (nanimals = 6) for S. chromogenes IM-sham, 1.83 ± 0.17 (nanimals = 6) for sham-S. uberis NADC C-1 and 1.83 ± 0.31 (nanimals = 6) for sham-sham. Macroscopic evaluation of the glands indicated swelling, increased vascularization and redness in all groups, regardless of the inoculum. A key finding, however, was the significant reduction (p < 0.001) of the S. uberis NADC C-1 load in the superchallenge group of 2.04 ± 0.43 log (i.e., 99%; difference between means ± SEM) compared to the sham-S. uberis NADC C-1 group (Figure 4A). On the other hand, S. chromogenes IM also showed a reduced (p = 0.05) bacterial growth of 2.35 ± 1.05 in the superchallenge group vs. the S. chromogenes IM-sham group (Figure 4B). As expected, no bacteria were isolated from the sham-sham inoculated group. Confirmation of the retrieved bacterial species after plating serial dilutions of the mammary gland homogenates on Columbia blood agar (5% defibrinated sheep blood) was done by MALDI-ToF MS as described by our group (data not shown) [13]. Plating on this agar allowed to distinguish S. uberis from S. chromogenes based on colony morphology. Microscopic evaluation of the mammary glands showed that the sham-S. uberis NADC C-1, S. chromogenes IM-sham and S. chromogenes IM-S. uberis NADC C-1 groups all induced a similar influx of PMNs in the alveoli, which was again absent in the sham-sham inoculated glands (Figures 4C–F). The IL-8 concentrations in the S. chromogenes IM-S. uberis NADC C-1-treated mammary gland lysates were non-significantly augmented (p > 0.05) in comparison with the sham-sham, sham-S. uberis and S. chromogenes IM-sham inoculated glands (Figure 4G). As for the LCN2 concentrations, the S. chromogenes IM-S. uberis NADC C-1 gland lysates differed significantly (p < 0.01) from both non-primed groups, i.e. sham-sham and sham-S. uberis, but not from the S. chromogenes IM-sham inoculated glands (p > 0.05) (Figure 4H).

Figure 3
figure 3

Representation of the superchallenge experiment to investigate Staphylococcus chromogenes priming against Streptococcus uberis infection. Mice were intramammarily inoculated with either 104 CFU S. chromogenes IM (challenge) or sham (PBS), followed by a second inoculation 24 h later with either 103 CFU S. uberis NADC C-1 (infection) or sham (PBS). This led to 4 groups i.e., (1) S. chromogenes IM-S. uberis-inoculated (black), (2) S. chromogenes IM-sham (horizontal stripes), (3) sham-S. uberis (asterisks) and (4) sham-sham (vertical stripes) mice. “n” represents the number of animals inoculated in each group.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4

Priming effect of Staphylococcus chromogenes IM in the murine mammary gland against Streptococcus uberis infection. Bacterial growth of A S. uberis and B S. chromogenes IM, concentrations of G IL-8 and H LCN2 in mouse mammary glands, as well as representative H&E-stained sections thereof, harvested 48 h after intraductally inoculating C, E sham (PBS) or D, F 104 CFU S. chromogenes IM, followed by a second inoculation after a 24 h interval with either C, D sham or E, F 103 CFU S. uberis NADC C-1. Data are shown as individual points with a line indicating the mean and an error bar representing the SEM. Double (**) and triple (***) asterisks indicate respectively p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, whereas “ns” indicates non-significance corresponding to a p > 0.05. Pictures were taken at a ×10 and ×40 magnification, with scale bars indicating 100 µm and 25 µm, respectively.

Full size image

Discussion

Mastitis is the most common disease in modern dairy farming, causing economic losses and resulting in substantial antibiotic use [17, 18]. Given the society demand as well as governmental policies (e.g., European Green Deal, WHO; new EU Regulation on Veterinary Medicines 2019/06) to reduce antimicrobial use in animal agriculture, interest in alternative strategies such as the use of probiotics has become very actual [18]. In the specific case of bovine mastitis, recent insights are suggesting the use of bovine NAS to prime the mammary gland and prevent infection by major mastitis pathogens [8, 9, 11]. In this proof-of-concept study, priming of the mammary gland with S. chromogenes IM, a NAS strain previously characterized and used by our groups in multiple in vitro and in vivo studies [5,6,7, 12, 13, 19], was investigated to counteract mastitis caused by the major mastitis pathogen S. uberis in a mouse mastitis model [14, 15]. First, the inoculum dose and priming potential of the murine mammary gland by this specific NAS strain were studied. It was observed that S. chromogenes IM attained a similar bacterial load in the murine mammary gland regardless of the inoculation dose. We hypothesize that a low to moderate S. chromogenes IM dose induces a similar priming effect as a high inoculum dose. However, it is important to note that our study cannot confirm that different inoculation doses produce similar priming effects and priming by NAS has not yet been fully elucidated in literature. The choice for a 104 CFU inoculation dose of bacteria can be suggested from the observed increase in iron-chelating LCN2 which coincided with the increase in inoculated bacteria. An increase in the LCN2 refers to an activation of the innate immune system. The mammary tissue is prepared for future major pathogenic infections such as in this case S. uberis by LCN2 increase. The more LCN2 is released, the more iron will be chelated and the better bacterial growth can be inhibited [16]. Second, an appropriate S. uberis candidate strain (i.e., NADC C-1) was selected based on the high and reproducible bacterial load retrieved as well as a clear influx of PMNs 24 hpi. Third, it was shown that after inoculation with S. chromogenes IM, this priming reduces the subsequent mammary growth of S. uberis NADC C-1 in the murine mammary gland by 99%. It should be emphasized that S. uberis NADC C-1 was still able to colonize the murine mammary gland even in the presence of this particular NAS strain. Indeed, it is important to note that the reduced growth of S. uberis NADC C-1 was obtained by priming the murine mammary gland with 104 CFU S. chromogenes IM, but the use of other bacterial strains or inoculation doses might have resulted in a different outcome. On the other hand, our research also revealed the limits of S. chromogenes IM as a potential priming agent against S. uberis mastitis. Likewise observed in dairy cows [13], S. chromogenes IM induces mastitis in the murine mammary gland. Indeed, the observed influx of polymorphonuclear immune cells and significantly increased levels of proinflammatory mediators IL-8 and LCN2 support this latter statement. Therefore, it might not be advisable to apply S. chromogenes-based primers during cow lactation unless a (slight) increase of the somatic cell count due to this priming effect is accepted [20]. However, from a mastitis prevention point-of-view a promising strategy might be to apply NAS rather in the cow's dry-off period [2]. The spread of NAS, adapted to cows, would be limited for milking equipment [21]. Dry-off also marks the critical point in dairy farming since most antibiotics are prophylactically used in an attempt to reduce the intramammary infection risk during this period and clinical mastitis in the next lactation [17, 18]. In our mouse mastitis model, priming of the immune system by S. chromogenes IM was clearly observed and defined by hallmark signs of inflammation as was previously seen for lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid [14]. Our proof-of-concept superchallenge findings corroborate and further support other reports stating some NAS offer a priming potential to prevent mastitis by the major mastitis pathogen S. uberis [9, 11]. Preliminary proof hereof has already been delivered some decades ago but also very recently in the context of S. aureus [8, 10]. Taken together, we here showed that S. chromogenes IM priming of the murine mammary gland reduces bacterial growth of S. uberis NADC C-1 substantially.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Tang KL, Caffrey NP, Nóbrega DB, Cork SC, Ronksley PE, Barkema HW, Polachek AJ, Ganshorn H, Sharma N, Kellner JD, Ghali WA (2017) Restricting the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals and human beings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planet Health 1:e316–e327. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30141-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rainard P, Foucras G (2018) A critical appraisal of probiotics for mastitis control. Front Vet Sci 5:251. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fvets.2018.00251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanderhaeghen W, Piepers S, Leroy F, Van Coillie E, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2014) Invited review: effect, persistence, and virulence of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species associated with ruminant udder health. J Dairy Sci 97:5275–5293. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3168/jds.2013-7775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adkins PRF, Placheta LM, Borchers MR, Bewley JM, Middleton JR (2022) Distribution of staphylococcal and mammaliicoccal species from compost-bedded pack or sand-bedded freestall dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 105:6261–6270. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3168/jds.2021-21500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Souza FN, Piepers S, Della Libera AMMP, Heinemann MB, Cerqueira MMOP, De Vliegher S (2016) Interaction between bovine-associated coagulase-negative staphylococci species and strains and bovine mammary epithelial cells reflects differences in ecology and epidemiological behavior. J Dairy Sci 99:2867–2874. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3168/jds.2015-10230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breyne K, De Vliegher S, De Visscher A, Piepers S, Meyer A (2015) Technical note: A pilot study using a mouse mastitis model to study differences between bovine associated coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Dairy Sci 98:1090–1100. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3168/jds.2014-8699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Piccart K, Verbeke J, De Visscher A, Piepers S, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2016) Local host response following an intramammary challenge with Staphylococcus fleurettii and different strains of Staphylococcus chromogenes in dairy heifers. Vet Res 47:56. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-016-0338-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews KR, Harmon RJ, Smith BA (1990) Protective effect of Staphylococcus chromogenes infection against Staphylococcus aureus infection in the lactating bovine mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 73:3457–3462. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)79044-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Vliegher S, Opsomer G, Vanrolleghem A, Devriese LA, Sampimon OC, Sol J, Barkema HW, Haesebrouck F, de Kruif A (2004) In vitro growth inhibition of major mastitis pathogens by Staphylococcus chromogenes originating from teat apices of dairy heifers. Vet Microbiol 101:215–221. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brouillette E, Goetz C, Droppa-Almeida D, Chamberland S, Jacques M, Malouin F (2022) Secondary Staphylococcus aureus intramammary colonization is reduced by non-aureus staphylococci exoproducts. Microbes Infect 24:104879. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.micinf.2021.104879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braem G, Stijlemans B, Van Haken W, De Vliegher S, De Vuyst L, Leroy F (2014) Antibacterial activities of coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine teat apex skin and their inhibitory effect on mastitis-related pathogens. J Appl Microbiol 116:1084–1093. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jam.12447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Toledo-Silva B, Beuckelaere L, De Visscher A, Geeroms C, Meyer E, Piepers S, Thiry D, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2022) Novel quantitative assay to describe in vitro bovine mastitis bacterial pathogen inhibition by non-aureus staphylococci. Pathogens 11:264. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens11020264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Beuckelaere L, De Visscher A, de Souza FN, Meyer E, Haesebrouck F, Piepers S, De Vliegher S (2021) Colonization and local host response following intramammary Staphylococcus chromogenes challenge in dry cows. Vet Res 52:137. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-021-01007-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Breyne K, Steenbrugge J, Demeyere K, Vanden Berghe T, Meyer E (2017) Preconditioning with lipopolysaccharide or lipoteichoic acid protects against Staphylococcus aureus mammary infection in mice. Front Immunol 8:833. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Notebaert S, Meyer E (2006) Mouse models to study the pathogenesis and control of bovine mastitis. A review Vet Q 28:2–13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/01652176.2006.9695201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vander Elst N, Breyne K, Steenbrugge J, Gibson AJ, Smith DGE, Germon P, Werling D, Meyer E (2020) Enterobactin deficiency in a coliform mastitis isolate decreases its fitness in a murine model: a preliminary host–pathogen interaction study. Front Vet Sci 7:576583. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fvets.2020.576583

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevens M, Piepers S, Supré K, Dewulf J, De Vliegher S (2016) Quantification of antimicrobial consumption in adult cattle on dairy herds in Flanders, Belgium, and associations with udder health, milk quality, and production performance. J Dairy Sci 99:2118–2130. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3168/jds.2015-10199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruegg PL (2022) Realities, challenges and benefits of antimicrobial stewardship in dairy practice in the United States. Microorganisms 10:1626. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10081626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Toledo-Silva B, de Souza FN, Piepers S, Mertens K, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2021) Metabolites of bovine-associated non-aureus staphylococci influence expression of Staphylococcus aureus agr-related genes in vitro. Vet Res 52:62. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-021-00933-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. De Buck J, Ha V, Naushad S, Nobrega DB, Luby C, Middleton JR, De Vliegher S, Barkema HW (2021) Non-aureus staphylococci and bovine udder health: current understanding and knowledge gaps. Front Vet Sci 8:658031. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fvets.2021.658031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Green MJ, Burton PR, Green LE, Schukken YH, Bradley AJ, Peeler EJ, Medley GF (2004) The use of Markov chain Monte Carlo for analysis of correlated binary data: Patterns of somatic cells in milk and the risk of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Prev Vet Med 64:157–174. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.05.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Kristel Demeyere, Astrid Thys and Lisa Beuckelaere for their efforts with regards to their support in data collection and curation.

Funding

This work has been supported by a grant from Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) and Elanco Animal Health (Greenfield, IN, USA) (AIO.ONO.2014.0004). NV, JB and JS are grateful to Research Foundation of Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen) for their fellowships. BTS is grateful for funding through the Industrial Research Fund (IOF, Ghent University). The MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer was financed by Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) as Hercules project G0H2516N (AUGE/15/05).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Niels Vander Elst and Julie Bellemans share first authorship

  2. Sarne De Vliegher and Evelyne Meyer share last authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Niels Vander Elst, Julie Bellemans, Jonas Steenbrugge & Evelyne Meyer

  2. M-Team and Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Chloë Geeroms, Sofie Piepers, Bruno Toledo-Silva, Fernando Nogueira de Souza & Sarne De Vliegher

  3. Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Neurology and Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Building 149, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA

    Koen Breyne

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Fernando Nogueira de Souza

  5. Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Freddy Haesebrouck

Authors
  1. Niels Vander Elst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julie Bellemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonas Steenbrugge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chloë Geeroms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Koen Breyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sofie Piepers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bruno Toledo-Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fernando Nogueira de Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Freddy Haesebrouck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sarne De Vliegher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Evelyne Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception or design of the work: SDV and EM. Data collection: CG, JS, KB. Data analysis and interpretation: JB, NV, SP, CG, BTS, FNS, SDV and EM. Drafting the article: NV, JB, FH, SDV and EM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyne Meyer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures on mice were executed at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Ghent University (Merelbeke, Belgium) and with approval of the ethics committee (Approval Number 2017/22).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Marcelo Gottschalk

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vander Elst, N., Bellemans, J., Steenbrugge, J. et al. Priming of the murine mammary gland with Staphylococcus chromogenes IM reduces bacterial growth of Streptococcus uberis: a proof-of-concept study. Vet Res 54, 28 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-023-01156-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-023-01156-y

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716