Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Presence of potentially novel Helicobacter pylori-like organisms in gastric samples from cats and dogs

Veterinary Research volume 54, Article number: 93 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

While seven gastric non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter (NHPH) species are known to commonly colonize the stomach of cats and dogs, the potential of H. pylori and H. pylori-like organisms to infect animals remains controversial and was investigated in this study using gastric samples of 20 cats and 27 dogs. A Helicobacter genus-specific 16 S rRNA PCR assay, H. pylori-specific ureAB and glmM PCR assays and a nested PCR detecting 23 S rRNA in a Helicobacter genus-specific manner in a first round of PCR and a H. pylori-specific manner in a second round, were performed in combination with sequencing. Histopathological and anti-Helicobacter immunohistochemical evaluations were also performed. Based on 16 S rRNA sequence analysis, 39/47 animals (83%) appeared infected with canine/feline gastric NHPHs in the corpus and/or antrum. H. pylori-specific ureAB amplicons were obtained in samples of 22 stomachs (47%). One canine antrum sample positive in the ureAB assay was also positive in the H. pylori-specific glmM assay. While 36/47 (77%) animals had a positive sample in the first round of the nested 23 S rRNA PCR assay, all samples were negative in the second round. Sequence analysis of obtained amplicons and immunohistochemistry point towards the presence of unidentified H. pylori-like organisms in cats and dogs. Histopathological examination suggests a low pathogenic significance of the gastric Helicobacter spp. present in these animals. In conclusion, cats and dogs may be (co-)infected with gastric Helicobacter organisms other than the known gastric NHPHs. Culture and isolation should be performed to confirm this hypothesis.

Introduction

Within the genus Helicobacter, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is by far the most widely known species. It is a gastric Helicobacter species residing in the stomach of humans since the existence of the modern human [1]. At present, it is known to infect more than 50% of the human population worldwide, with a higher prevalence in low-income countries compared to developed countries [2]. Marshall and Warren were the first to isolate this bacterium from a human gastric biopsy, dating from 1982, and to provide the evidence for an association between H. pylori infection and gastric disease [3]. H. pylori infections can result in asymptomatic carriership, but may also cause acute and chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and less often gastric carcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [4].

Besides H. pylori, there are 52 other validly published Helicobacter species, called non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter (NHPH) species, of which 16 that also prefer to colonize the gastric mucosa of their specific host [5]. H. ailurogastricus, H. baculiformis, H. bizzozeronii, H. cynogastricus, H. felis, H. heilmannii s.s. and H. salomonis belong to a group of canine and feline associated gastric NHPHs. In several case reports and cohort studies, these have been described to colonize the stomach of domestic and stray dogs and cats. Some of these reports link NHPH infections to a higher susceptibility for feline gastric MALT lymphoma [6] or more severe gastritis in dogs [7], however, most of them point towards a low pathogenic impact of gastric NHPHs in cats and dogs [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. This low pathogenic impact may be explained by the fact that these canine/feline associated gastric NHPHs have coevolved with their host far before domestication of either cats or dogs [18]. Most of these dog- and cat-associated NHPHs may also infect humans, which may result in gastric disease [19, 20].

Interestingly, there have been sporadic reports of natural H. pylori infections in cats and dogs. Already in 1994, Handt et al. [21], reported the isolation of H. pylori from the gastric tissue of 6 cats, confirmed by morphologic and biochemical evaluations, fatty acid analysis and 16 S rRNA sequence analysis and suggested the detection of H. pylori based on histopathological evaluation in an additional 15 cats. They hypothesized a causal role of H. pylori for the development of lymphofollicular gastritis in domestic cats and a zoonotic component for the transmission of H. pylori in humans. Later, these conclusions were challenged by El-Zaatari et al. [22], among others, who reported that owning cats is not associated with a higher risk of acquiring H. pylori infections, but sporadic H. pylori infections in cats are likely cases of anthroponoses. More recently, Kubota-Aizawa et al. [23] reported the detection of infections with identical H. pylori strains in a woman and her two dogs, based on sequence analysis of partial ureAB sequences. Here too, the mode of transmission was considered to be anthroponotic.

Of note, Krakowka et al. [24] have reported the presence of H. pylori-like organisms in pigs, which are structurally and immunologically closely related to, however antigenically distinct from, H. pylori, and morphologically distinct from H. suis, which is a well-known pathogen in pigs. Such pig associated H. pylori-like organisms have also been described by Cortez Nunes et al. [25] who detected Helicobacter species in DNA samples of gastric tissue of 36 out of 71 pigs (50.7%) for which amplification in a ureAB gene based H. pylori-specific PCR assay was achieved (as confirmed by sequencing), but not in a glmM gene based H. pylori-specific PCR assay.

Consequently, the aim of the current study was to further investigate the presence of H. pylori(-like organisms) in cats and dogs.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Samples were collected in the autopsy room of the Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Merelbeke, Belgium, during a period dating from November 9th, 2022 until December 9th, 2022. In total, 47 animals, all from different owners, were included, of which 20 cats and 27 dogs. The stomach of each animal was opened along the greater curvature and the insides were rinsed with tap water. From each stomach, 3 samples were taken from both the antrum and the corpus using 8 mm disposable biopsy punches and/or autoclaved scissors and tweezers for DNA extraction. Also using autoclaved scissors and tweezers, additional biopsy samples from the antrum and corpus were taken for histology purposes. In 33 cases where stool was present in the colon, a stool sample was also collected. The samples were stored at −20 °C until further processing.

DNA of 24 more dog stool samples from another study (unpublished results) were also included. These were fresh stool samples collected from alive dogs, either healthy or suffering from idiopathic epilepsy. These dogs were all from different owners.

DNA extraction, PCR assays and sequencing

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from the gastric biopsy samples of the antrum and the corpus, separately, using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. As for the stool samples, DNA was extracted using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Table 1 Details on PCR primers and protocols
Full size table

PCR assays

Helicobacter genus-specific 16 S rRNA PCR assay

A Helicobacter genus-specific PCR assay was performed as previously described [20]. Details on the primer sequences and thermocycling conditions can be found in Table 1. As a positive control, genomic DNA of the H. suis strain HS5 was used. For visualization and analysis of the PCR assays, 5 µL of each PCR product was analyzed through gel electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose (AGRMP-RO Roche, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) with Midori Green (NIPPON Genetics, Düren, Germany) in TBE buffer (VWR Life Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). GeneRuler 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder (Thermo Scientific™ SM0323) was used as a weight marker. Images were acquired on a UV transilluminator (UVP PhotoDoc-it Imaging Systems, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA).

Helicobacter pylori-specific PCR assays

Two different Helicobacter-specific PCR assays were performed, one based on the ureAB gene and another based on the glmM gene [20]. Details on the primer sequences and thermocycling conditions can be found in Table 1. As a positive control, genomic DNA of the H. pylori strain SS1 was used. For visualization and analysis of the PCR assay, gel electrophoresis was performed as described above.

Nested Helicobacter pylori 23 S rRNA PCR assay

A nested PCR in two rounds targeting the 23 S rRNA gene was performed, of which the first PCR is Helicobacter genus specific while the second PCR is H. pylori-specific. For the first PCR, each PCR reaction volume consisted of 20 µL containing 2.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 1x GoTaq® Flexi PCR buffer (Promega), 200 µM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) (Bioline), 0.5 µM forward primer, 0.5 µM reverse primer, 0.6 U GoTaq® Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega) and 2 µL of the DNA sample. For the second PCR, each PCR reaction volume consisted of 25 µL containing 2.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 1x GoTaq® Flexi PCR buffer (Promega), 200 µM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) (Bioline), 0.5 µM forward primer, 0.5 µM reverse primer, 0.75 U GoTaq® Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega) and 1.5 µL of the DNA sample. Details on the primer sequences and thermocycling conditions can be found in Table 1. As a positive control, genomic DNA of the H. pylori strain SS1 was used. For visualization and analysis of the PCR assay, gel electrophoresis was performed as described above after each PCR round.

Sequencing

The PCR products of samples positive in any of the PCR assays were sent to Eurofins Genomics® (Edersberg, Germany) for bidirectional Sanger sequencing, in order to avoid false positive results and confirm the Helicobacter species present. Sequencing analysis of amplicons positive for Helicobacter genus-specific 16 S rRNA PCR allows discrimination between H. suis, canine and feline associated gastric NHPHs as a group, and H. pylori. Sequence editing and assembly of the received amplicon sequences was done using BioNumerics® software (version 7.6.3, Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) and the contig sequences were subjected to the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the non-redundant nucleotide database [29]. A cut-off value of 96% was used for average nucleotide identity as a threshold for species delineation [30].

Alignment and phylogenetic analysis

The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [31]. Multiple sequence alignment was done using ClustalW with a gap opening penalty of 15 and gap extension penalty of 6.66. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates was taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [32]. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method [33] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA11 [34].

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

Histopathology

For histopathology, the biopsies were fixed in formalin and processed for paraffin embedding (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)). Samples were sectioned at 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for light microscopic evaluation. Histopathological evaluation was performed by an experienced veterinary histopathologist (KC) in a blinded manner and was based on histopathological standards described by Day et al. [35].

Immunohistochemistry

For anti-H. pylori staining, sections of 5 μm were deparaffinized and hydrated, followed by microwave antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH = 6.0; 3.5 min at 850 W, 10 min at 450 W, 30 min cool down). After rinsing with wash buffer, slides were incubated with 3% H2O2 solution (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA) in methanol (5 min) to block endogenous peroxidase activity. The slides were rinsed once with distilled water and once with wash buffer before they were incubated with a primary antibody (30 min). A polyclonal genus-specific rabbit anti-H. pylori antibody (1/250; Agilent Technologies) was used. This commercial antibody was generated from an immunogen prepared from heat-treated cells of the H. pylori strain CH-20,426 [36] and is Helicobacter genus-specific. The antibody is known to cross-react with H. suis, H. bizzozeronii and H. felis in gastric tissue from experimentally infected rodents [37,38,39]. In gastric tissue, it was demonstrated that the sensitivity of the antibody for H. pylori was 83.8 ± 11.1% and the specificity 90.0 ± 0.0% [40]. The slides were rinsed with wash buffer and incubated with a peroxidase (HRP) labelled secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Agilent Technologies) (30 min). After rinsing twice with wash buffer, the slides were incubated with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution (Agilent Technologies) (5 min) for color development and rinsed with distilled water. Finally, the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted. Evaluation of the immunohistochemical stainings was underpinned by an experienced veterinary histopathologist (KC) and performed in a blinded manner.

Results

PCR and sequencing results

Absolute frequencies of sequencing-confirmed Helicobacter detection in the gastric samples of all cats and dogs included, for each PCR assay, are presented in Table 2. Although enterohepatic Helicobacter species were detected in 24 out of the 57 stool samples using the genus Helicobacter specific 16 S rRNA PCR, none of the stool samples were positive for gastric Helicobacter species in any of the assays performed.

Table 2 Frequency of Helicobacter detection in gastric samples of cats and dogs upon PCR and sequencing
Full size table

The results of the two-step nested 23 S rRNA PCR show that 36/47 (77%) animals had a sample positive in the first, Helicobacter genus specific PCR, while none of the animals had a sample positive in the second, H. pylori-specific PCR. By means of a Venn diagram, the intersection of the PCR results is displayed at the level of the animals (Figure 1). This shows that one dog had a sample, originating from the antrum, that was positive in all PCR assays, except for the H. pylori-specific final step of the nested 23 S rRNA PCR (010DA; see Additional file 1 for detailed results of each sample). However, BLAST results of the amplicon obtained in the glmM based H. pylori-specific PCR showed a 95.16% identity to Helicobacter pylori strain G-Mx-2003-108 chromosome (accession number: CP032044.1) and many other H. pylori strains accessible in the NCBI GenBank (including G-Mx-2006-152, FDAARGOS_300, SS1, J99, etc.) and a 96.61% identity and 95% query coverage to Helicobacter pylori DNA, complete genome, strain: PMSS1 (accession number: AP017633.1). Taking into account the % identity cut-off value of 96% for species delineation and a desirable query coverage of at least 95%, this sample was considered borderline positive (see Additional file 2 for detailed BLAST results). Except for this sample, no other sample was positive in the glmM based PCR, although samples of 22 animals (47%) were positive in the ureAB based H. pylori-specific assay. In 13/16 animals with a positive result in the 16 S rRNA PCR, ureAB PCR and Helicobacter genus specific 23 S rRNA PCR, these positive results were obtained simultaneously in at least one gastric sample of the individual animal. Regarding the 17 animals which had a positive result in the 16 S rRNA and Helicobacter genus specific 23 S rRNA PCR, in each case the assays were simultaneously positive in at least one of both gastric samples.

Figure 1
figure 1

Venn diagram showing the intersection of PCR and sequencing results at the level of the animals. Green circles indicate that the assays were positive simultaneously in at least one of both gastric samples of the animal(s); Red circles indicate that the assays were not simultaneously positive in one gastric sample of the animal(s). Created using: [41].

Full size image

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the obtained true positive amplicon sequences in each PCR assay in order to infer evolutionary history of gastric Helicobacter species, including potentially novel species, present in the included canine and feline stomach samples (Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5). GenBank reference sequences included in the analyses were obtained from the BLAST results.

Figure 2
figure 2

Neighbor-joining tree based on the comparison of 16 S rRNA gene sequences. This phylogenetic tree comprises 16 S rRNA amplicons obtained in the genus Helicobacter-specific 16 S rRNA PCR and relevant GenBank reference sequences. Sample names include the number assigned to the animal, followed by C or D (= cat or dog) and A or C (= antrum or corpus). Reference sequence names include the Helicobacter species, strain, accession number between brackets and host where possible.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Neighbor-joining tree based on the comparison of ureAB gene sequences. This phylogenetic tree comprises the ureAB amplicons obtained in the Helicobacter pylori-specific ureAB PCR and relevant GenBank reference sequences. One amplicon sequence was left out of this analysis because sequencing yielded an amplicon that was too short for multiple sequence alignment. Sample names include the number assigned to the animal, followed by C or D (= cat or dog) and A or C (= antrum or corpus). Reference sequence names include the Helicobacter species, strain, accession number between brackets and host where possible.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4

Neighbor-joining tree based on the comparison of glmM gene sequences. This phylogenetic tree comprises the glmM amplicon obtained in the Helicobacter pylori-specific glmM PCR and relevant GenBank reference sequences. Sample names include the number assigned to the animal, followed by C or D (= cat or dog) and A or C (= antrum or corpus). Reference sequence names include the Helicobacter species, strain, accession number between brackets and host where possible.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5

Neighbor-joining tree based on the comparison of 23 S rRNA gene sequences. This phylogenetic tree comprises 23 S rRNA amplicons obtained in the 1st genus Helicobacter-specific PCR of the nested 23 S rRNA PCR and relevant GenBank reference sequences. Eight amplicon sequences were left out of this analysis because sequencing yielded an amplicon that was too short for multiple sequence alignment. Sample names include the number assigned to the animal, followed by C or D (= cat or dog) and A or C (= antrum or corpus). Reference sequence names include the Helicobacter species, strain, accession number between brackets and host where possible.

Full size image

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

H&E stainings of gastric tissue of 29 animals (61.7%) showed no signs of gastric inflammation in the corpus or antrum (Table 3). These include 23 animals (79.3%) which were positive for the presence of canine/feline associated gastric NHPHs upon PCR (16 in corpus and antrum; four in corpus only; three in antrum only), 14 (48.3%) which had a biopsy specimen positive in the ureAB based H. pylori-specific PCR (out of which 11 were also positive for gastric NHPHs) (four in corpus and antrum; six in corpus only; four in antrum only) and one (3.4%) which had a biopsy specimen positive in both H. pylori-specific PCR assays (cfr. supra).

Table 3 Histopathological evaluation of gastric biopsy specimens based on hematoxylin and eosin staining
Full size table

In 17 animals (36.2%), follicular gastritis was evident in at least one biopsy specimen. Canine/feline associated gastric NHPHs were detected in 15 (88.2%) of these (14 in corpus and antrum; one in corpus only) and in seven (41.2%), at least one gastric biopsy specimen was positive in the ureAB based H. pylori-specific PCR (out of which 6 were also positive for gastric NHPHs) (one in corpus and antrum; four in corpus only; two in antrum only).

Anti-Helicobacter immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in case an animal had a gastric biopsy specimen positive in at least one H. pylori-specific PCR assay (i.e. 22 animals positive in the glmM and/or ureAB based assay). IHC confirmed the presence of the typically long, spiral-shaped gastric NHPHs in 14 of the 18 cases positive in the 16 S rRNA PCR (Figures 6A, B). Indications for the presence of organisms with a H. pylori-like morphology (short, curve- or s-shaped) were found in 14 cases (Figures 6C, D).

Figure 6
figure 6

Anti-Helicobacterimmunohistochemistry. A, B Long spiral-shaped gastric non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter species, detected in gastric biopsies 044DA (dog, antrum) and 007CC (cat, corpus), respectively. Total magnification ×1000. C, D H. pylori-like organisms detected in gastric biopsies 037DA (dog, antrum) and 043DC (dog, corpus), respectively. Total magnification ×1000.

Full size image

Discussion

The current results support that there may still be novel, uncultured and therefore uncharacterized, gastric Helicobacter species (co-)residing in the stomach of cats and dogs. By means of elegant gene admixture analyses performed by Smet et al. [18], it has been shown that intra- and interspecies gene exchange is not uncommon within the group of gastric Helicobacter species, especially considering canine/feline associated gastric NHPHs. Since these species are able to co-reside in the canine/feline stomach, this is a logical consequence. H. cynogastricus and H. baculiformis have even been identified as hybrid species considering the significant amount of DNA originating from H. felis. Also, genetic exchange from H. suis to H. heilmannii s.s. and H. ailurogastricus was revealed, although they do not share the same host. The latter may support why H. suis also contributed to the phylogenetic analysis results of the 23 S rRNA PCR amplicon sequences. The current results from H. pylori-specific PCR and sequencing analyses and those from partial ureAB sequence analyses performed by Kubota-Aizawa et al. [23] in samples of two dogs, may indicate a possibility of anthroponotic H. pylori infection and opportunities for genetic exchange between gastric Helicobacter species with human and animal hosts. The fact that no samples were positive in the H. pylori-specific final step of the nested 23 S rRNA PCR and only one sample was (borderline) positive in the H. pylori-specific glmM PCR, indicates that the species detected in these samples are not simply the known human associated H. pylori. As no information on the owners and only limited information on the included animals was available for this study, it was not possible to infer any possible transmission route hypotheses.

In the case of dog 010, there are clear indications for the presence of a Helicobacter species with a ureB and glmM sequence showing highest similarity with H. pylori sequences obtained from human hosts. Histopathological evaluations showed no signs of inflammation in the corpus or antrum and no macroscopic signs of gastric disease were noted in this dog’s autopsy report. However, anti-Helicobacter IHC did show the sporadic presence of possible H. pylori-like organisms, although the staining was not as clear compared to certain biopsies taken from other animals in this study due to autolysis.

Overall, this study points towards a low pathogenic significance of the gastric Helicobacter spp. detected in the included animals, since the frequency with which canine/feline associated gastric NHPHs and H. pylori-like organisms were detected in the PCR assays was similar for animals without signs of gastric inflammation and animals presenting with follicular gastritis upon histopathological evaluation. This supports the current hypothesis that canine/feline associated gastric NHPHs are highly adapted to the colonization niche of their natural hosts under normal conditions [18, 42].

In Figure 6, photographs of the IHC stainings of biopsies 037DA and 043DC were chosen to represent the presence of H. pylori-like organisms since these demonstrated the morphology of H. pylori most clearly. In retrospect, the H. pylori-specific ureAB sequences obtained from these biopsies showed highest similarity to a partial coding sequence deposited in the NCBI GenBank database described as “Helicobacter pylori isolate 39 urease subunit A and urease subunit B genes” (accession number: MW714655.1), which was obtained from a stomach sample of a wild boar and the organism was later also defined as a H. pylori-like organism based on PCR and sequencing analysis [25].

Since both the 16 S rRNA PCR assay and the first PCR of the nested 23 S rRNA PCR are genus Helicobacter-specific and multiple gastric NHPHs may have co-resided in the animals’ stomachs, the phylogenetic trees constructed with the amplicon sequences obtained from these assays cannot be interpreted unambiguously. However, some samples contained 23 S rRNA sequences most closely related to Helicobacter sp. NHP21005 DNA (AP028022.1), Helicobacter sp. NHP19-012 DNA (AP024819.1) and Helicobacter sp. NHP19-003 DNA (AP024814.1), of which the latter two have been described as a novel Helicobacter sp. isolated from a cat and from a dog, respectively (unpublished results from Rimbara et al., mentioned in the NCBI GenBank submission form of the respective genomes [43, 44]). From the 16 S rRNA phylogenetic analysis, it can be deduced that there is great genetic variation in the obtained 16 S rRNA amplicon sequences, since many amplicons showed highest similarity with gastric Helicobacter sequences obtained from cheetahs and other wild cats, red foxes and even humans, besides those obtained from domestic cats and dogs.

Ideally, the presence of these potentially novel canine/feline associated gastric Helicobacter species should be confirmed through culture and isolation of the species for in depth genomic and biochemical characterization, which was not possible in the current study. To this end, most probably fresh gastric samples will be required and the medium for culture will need to be optimized. Among other things, it will be necessary to test whether a biphasic medium is required, as is the case for H. suis, H. heilmannii s.s. and H. ailurogastricus, and what agar and pH (5 or 7) is optimal. Isolation may also be further complicated by the fact that, in most cases, multiple, already known, canine and feline associated gastric NHPHs colonize the stomach of dogs and cats, which may be able to grow better in the culture conditions applied.

In conclusion, the current results obtained through PCR and sequencing analysis and histological examination indicate that cats and dogs may be (co-)infected with gastric Helicobacter organisms other than the known gastric NHPHs. Culture and isolation methods should be applied to confirm the presence of these potentially novel H. pylori-like organisms and characterize them.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Linz B, Balloux F, Moodley Y, Manica A, Liu H, Roumagnac P, Falush D, Stamer C, Prugnolle F, van der Merwe SW, Yamaoka Y, Graham DY, Perez-Trallero E, Wadstrom T, Suerbaum S, Achtman M (2007) An African origin for the intimate association between humans and Helicobacter pylori. Nature 445:915–918

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, Malfertheiner P, Graham DY, Wong VWS, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Kaplan GG, Ng SC (2017) Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 153:420–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall BJ, Warren JR (1984) Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 323:1311–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kusters JG, Van Vliet AHM, Kuipers EJ (2006) Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 19:449–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Parte AC (2018) LPSN - list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:1825–1829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridgeford EC, Marini RP, Feng Y, Parry NMA, Rickman B, Fox JG (2008) Gastric Helicobacter species as a cause of feline gastric lymphoma: a viable hypothesis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 123:106–113

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kubota-Aizawa S, Ohno K, Fukushima K, Kanemoto H, Nakashima K, Uchida K, Chambers JK, Goto-Koshino Y, Watanabe T, Sekizaki T, Mimuro H, Tsujimoto H (2017) Epidemiological study of gastric Helicobacter spp. in dogs with gastrointestinal disease in Japan and diversity of Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto. Vet J 225:56–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubota-Aizawa S, Ohno K, Kanemoto H, Nakashima K, Fukushima K, Uchida K, Chambers JK, Goto-Koshino Y, Mimuro H, Watanabe T, Sekizaki T, Tsujimoto H (2017) Epidemiological study on feline gastric Helicobacter spp. in Japan. J Vet Med Sci 79:876–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Neiger R, Dieterich C, Burnens A, Waldvogel A, Corthésy-Theulaz I, Halter F, Lauterburg B, Schmassmann A (1998) Detection and prevalence of Helicobacter infection in pet cats. J Clin Microbiol 36:634–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Norris CR, Marks SL, Eaton KA, Torabian SZ, Munn RJ, Solnick JV (1999) Healthy cats are commonly colonized with Helicobacter heilmannii that is associated with minimal gastritis. J Clin Microbiol 37:189–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Scanziani E, Simpson KW, Monestiroli S, Soldati S, Strauss-Ayali D, Del Piero F (2001) Histological and immunohistochemical detection of different Helicobacter species in the gastric mucosa of cats. J Vet Diagn Invest 13:3–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermanns W, Kregel K, Breuer W, Lechner J (1995) Helicobacter-like organisms: histopathological examination of gastric biopsies from dogs and cats. J Comp Pathol 112:307–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerra Segundo DD, Mello CBE, Cargnelutti JF, Flores MM, Pedrotti LF, Antunes BN, Milech V, Velasquez OG, Martins LR, Pinto Filho STL (2021) Evidence of Helicobacter spp. in saliva and gastric mucosa of domestic dogs in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Vet Med Int 2021:8857231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ekman E, Fredriksson M, Trowald-Wigh G (2013) Helicobacter spp. in the saliva, stomach, duodenum and faeces of colony dogs. Vet J 195:127–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Polanco R, Salazar V, Reyes N, García-Amado MA, Michelangeli F, Contreras M (2011) Alta prevalencia de ADN de los helicobacteres no-H. pylori en la mucosa gástrica de perros domésticos venezolanos y sus alteraciones histopatológicas. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 53:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiinberg B, Spohr A, Dietz HH, Egelund T, Greiter-Wilke A, McDonough SP, Olsen J, Priestnall S, Chang YF, Simpson KW (2005) Quantitative analysis of inflammatory and immune responses in dogs with gastritis and their relationship to Helicobacter spp. infection. J Vet Intern Med 19:4–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Amorim I, Smet A, Alves O, Teixeira S, Saraiva AL, Taulescu M, Reis C, Haesebrouck F, Gärtner F (2015) Presence and significance of Helicobacter spp. in the gastric mucosa of Portuguese dogs. Gut Pathog 7:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Smet A, Yahara K, Rossi M, Tay A, Backert S, Armin E, Fox JG, Flahou B, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F, Corander J (2018) Macroevolution of gastric Helicobacter species unveils interspecies admixture and time of divergence. ISME J 12:2518–2531

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Taillieu E, Chiers K, Amorim I, Gärtner F, Maes D, Van Steenkiste C, Haesebrouck F (2022) Gastric Helicobacter species associated with dogs, cats and pigs: significance for public and animal health. Vet Res 53:42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Taillieu E, De Witte C, De Schepper H, Van Moerkercke W, Rutten S, Michiels S, Arnst Y, De Bruyckere S, Francque S, van Aert F, George C, Callewaert E, Callewaert T, Vanneste G, Vanderstraeten E, Van Heddegem N, Vansteelant M, Chiers K, Haesebrouck F, Van Steenkiste C (2023) Clinical significance and impact of gastric non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter species in gastric disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 57:1432–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Handt LK, Fox JG, Dewhirst FE, Fraser GJ, Paster BJ, Yan LL, Rozmiarek H, Rufo R, Stalis IH (1994) Helicobacter pylori isolated from the domestic cat: public health implications. Infect Immun 62:2367–2374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Zaatari FAK, Woo JS, Badr A, Osato MS, Serna H, Lichtenberger LM, Genta RM, Graham DY (1997) Failure to isolate Helicobacter pylori from stray cats indicates that H. pylori in cats may be an anthroponosis - an animal infection with a human pathogen. J Med Microbiol 46:372–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kubota-Aizawa S, Matsubara Y, Kanemoto H, Mimuro H, Uchida K, Chambers J, Tsuboi M, Ohno K, Fukushima K, Kato N, Yotsuyanagi H, Tsujimoto H (2021) Transmission of Helicobacter pylori between a human and two dogs: a case report. Helicobacter 26:e12798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krakowka S, Ringler SS, Flores J, Kearns RJ, Eaton KA, Ellis JA (2005) Isolation and preliminary characterization of a novel Helicobacter species from swine. Am J Vet Res 66:938–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cortez Nunes F, Letra Mateus T, Taillieu E, Teixeira S, Carolino N, Rema A, De Bruyckere S, Gärtner F, Haesebrouck F, Amorim I (2022) Molecular detection of Helicobacter spp. and Fusobacterium gastrosuis in pigs and wild boars and its association with gastric histopathological alterations. Vet Res 53:78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi YK, Han JH, Joo HS (2001) Identification of novel Helicobacter species in pig stomachs by PCR and partial sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 39:3311–3315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu J, He L, Haesebrouck F, Gong Y, Flahou B, Cao Q, Zhang J (2014) Prevalence of coinfection with gastric non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter (NHPH) species in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients suffering from gastric disease in Beijing. China Helicobacter 20:284–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rimbara E, Sasatsu M, Graham DY (2013) PCR detection of Helicobacter pylori in clinical samples. Methods Mol Biol 943:279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Basic local alignment search tool. https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi. Accessed 10 May 2023

  30. Praet J, Cnockaert M, Meeus I, Smagghe G, Vandamme P (2017) Gilliamella intestini sp. nov., Gilliamellabombicola sp. nov., Gilliamellabombi sp. nov. and Gilliamella mensalis sp. nov.: Four novel Gilliamella species isolated from the bumblebee gut. Syst Appl Microbiol 40:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:11030–11035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022–3027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Day MJ, Bilzer T, Mansell J, Wilcock B, Hall EJ, Jergens A, Minami T, Willard M, Washabau R (2008) Histopathological standards for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal inflammation in endoscopic biopsy samples from the dog and cat: a report from the world small animal veterinary association gastrointestinal standardization group. J Comp Pathol 138:S1–S43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersen LP, Holck S, Povlsen CO (1988) Campylobacter pylori detected by indirect immunohistochemical technique. APMIS 96:559–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. De Witte C, Taminiau B, Flahou B, Hautekiet V, Daube G, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F (2018) In-feed bambermycin medication induces anti-inflammatory effects and prevents parietal cell loss without influencing Helicobacter suis colonization in the stomach of mice. Vet Res 49:35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. De Bock M, D’Herde K, Duchateau L, Hellemans A, Decostere A, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R (2006) The effect of Helicobacter felis and Helicobacter bizzozeronii on the gastric mucosa in mongolian gerbils: a sequential pathological study. J Comp Pathol 135:226–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Flahou B, De Baere T, Chiers K, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R (2010) Gastric infection with Kazachstania heterogenica influences the outcome of a Helicobacter suis infection in Mongolian gerbils. Helicobacter 15:67–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jonkers D, Stobberingh E, de Bruine A, Arends JW, Stockbrügger R (1997) Evaluation of immunohistochemistry for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric mucosal biopsies. J Infect 35:149–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bioinformatics & evolutionary genomics. https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/

  42. Teixeira S, Filipe D, Cerqueira M, Barradas P, Cortez Nunes F, Faria F, Haesebrouck F, Mesquita JR, Gärtner F, Amorim I (2022) Helicobacter spp. in the stomach of cats: successful colonization and absence of relevant histopathological alterations reveals high adaptation to the host gastric niche. Vet Sci 9:228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Helicobacter sp. NHP19-012 DNA, complete genome. https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/nuccore/AP024819.1. Accessed 31 May 2023

  44. Helicobacter sp. NHP19-003 DNA, complete genome. https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/nuccore/AP024814.1. Accessed 31 May 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sarah Loomans, Joachim Christiaens and Delphine Ameye for their excellent technical assistance in tissue staining and Fien Verdoodt for kindly providing DNA of faecal samples of dogs included in her study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Fund of Ghent University, Belgium (BOF GOA 01G01014).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Koen Chiers and Freddy Haesebrouck shared senior authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Emily Taillieu, Sofie De Bruyckere, Koen Chiers & Freddy Haesebrouck

  2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium

    Christophe Van Steenkiste

  3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium

    Christophe Van Steenkiste

Authors
  1. Emily Taillieu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sofie De Bruyckere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christophe Van Steenkiste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Koen Chiers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Freddy Haesebrouck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ET performed the sampling, performed wet lab procedures, analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. SDB performed wet lab procedures. CVS supervised the project and revised the manuscript. KC and FH were involved in the study set-up, data interpretation, supervision of the project and revision of the manuscript. KC also performed histological examinations. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Taillieu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Marcelo Gottschalk.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taillieu, E., De Bruyckere, S., Van Steenkiste, C. et al. Presence of potentially novel Helicobacter pylori-like organisms in gastric samples from cats and dogs. Vet Res 54, 93 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-023-01223-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13567-023-01223-4

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716